ISSN: 1859 - 2872
Assessing the motor rehabilitation of post stroke’s patients by motor assessment scale (MAS)
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Summary
Objective: To assess the motor recovering results of post stroke’s patients by motor assessment scale. Subject and method: 87 patients were received and treated at Rehabilitation Department of 108 Military Central Hospital in 2019. Using MAS to assess eight motor activities include lying, sitting, standing, walking, arm and hand’s activities of patients. Each activity is graded from 0 to 6 points. Total score is 48 points. Result and conclusion: After treatment, the motor recovery was better improved with increased points were 5.14 ± 1.73 (p<0.001) in which the group of posture moving was much more improved than the group of arm and hand’s activities. The posture moving point was 3.59 ± 0.95 increasingly while the arm and hand’s activities point was only 0.74 ± 0.10. Clearly changings were posture moving from lie supine to lie on one’s side, lie supine to sit up, keep balanced sitting and sit to stand up. The arm and hand’s activities need more time for entirely recovery.
Keywords: Motor assessment scale, rehabilitation, upper limb movement, stroke.
Article Details
References
2. Lương Tuấn Khanh (2017) Phục hồi chức năng sau đột quỵ - Từ nguyên lý phục hồi vận động đến thực tiễn. Tập huấn chuyên ngành PHCN khu vực phía Bắc, Cục Quân y năm 2017, tr. 83-92.
3. Nguyễn Thị Kim Liên, Cao Minh Châu (2004) Đánh giá hiệu quả PHCN của bàn tay bệnh nhân liệt nửa người do tai biến mạch máu não. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học, 30(4), tr. 52-56.
4. Nguyễn Thị Kim Liên, Trần Việt Hà (2015) Hiệu quả phục hồi chức năng chi trên ở bệnh nhân liệt nửa người do nhồi máu não theo chương trình GRASP. Tạp chí Y dược học Quân sự, Số 1-2015, tr. 85-90.
5. Lê Văn Thính (2017) Cơ chế phục hồi chức năng thần kinh sau đột quỵ não - thuốc điều trị. Phục hồi chức năng thần kinh sau đột quỵ, Nhà xuất bản Y học, tr. 10-11.
6. Andrew B (1981) The rate of recovery from stroke and its measurement. Int Rehabil Med 3: 155-161.
7. Bobath B (1990) Adult hemiplegia: evaluation and treatment. Oxford, UK: Butterworth – Heinemann.
8. Broeks JG et al (1999) The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: Results of a follow – up studying. Disability and Rehabilitation 21(8): 357-364.
9. Carr JH, Shepherd RB et al (1985) Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patient. Phys Ther 65: 175-180.
10. Kwakkel G, Kollen B (2006) Impact of time on Improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke (37): 2348-2353.
Article Sidebar
