UBM features of eyes during acute angle closure glaucoma

  • Nguyễn Xuân Hiệp
  • Đỗ Tấn
  • Nguyễn Đình Ngân
  • Lê Thị Thanh Trà

Main Article Content

Keywords

Acute angle closure glaucoma, UBM, pupillary block, plateau iris

Abstract

Summary


Objective: To describe UBM features of eyes during acute angle closure glaucoma. Subject and method: This cross-sectional observational study that was conducted in Glaucoma Department and Ocular Imaging Department of Vietnam National Eye Hospital from May 2018 to March 2019. Recruited subjects were eyes with primary angle acute attack. UBM has been done during the attack associated while comparing affected eyes and contralateral unaffected eyes. Angle closure pattern was classified according to Svend Vedel Kessing and John Thygesen criteria (2007). Result: Study was based on results of 68 eyes/68 patients. Of those 68 patients, there were 57 females (83.8%) and 11 males (16.2%) (female/male = 5.18/1). The mean age of studied subjects was 62.05 years. Among 68 studied eyes, there were 29 eyes with pupillary block pattern (PB) (43%) and 39 eyes with plateau iris pattern (PI) (57%).  There was no significant difference in term of axial length, AC UBM features between 2 sub-groups. The specific UBM features for PI were steep iris root, anteriorly rotated ciliary body (TCPB, ICPD) and sulcus absence. There was also no significant difference in angle UBM parameters between 55 affected eyes and 55 contralateral unaffected eyes. Conclusion: High rate of PI in angle closure acute attack patients can change the treatment strategy especially the prevention. Very narrow angle in suspect eyes required intermediate prophylactic laser.


Keywords: Acute angle closure glaucoma, UBM, pupillary block, plateau iris.

Article Details

References

1. Bộ Y tế - Bệnh viện Mắt Trung ương (2003) Hướng dẫn chẩn đoán, điều trị và quản lý bệnh glôcôm nguyên phát. Nhà xuất bản Y học, Hà Nội, tr. 20.
2. Chelvin CA, FRCS(Ed) et al (2014) Pretreatment anterior segment imaging during acute primary angle closure: Insights into angle closure mechanisms in the acute phase. American Academy of Ophthalmology 21: 119-125.
3. Paul JF, Jamyanjav B, Poul HA et al (1996) Glaucoma in Mongolia: A population-based survey in Hövsgöl province, northern mongolia. Archives of ophthalmology 114(10): 1235-1241.
4. Kessing SV, Thygesen J (2007) Main groups and subeclassification of primary angle closure. Primary Angle-Closure and Angle-Closure Glaucoma, Kugler Publications; 1 edition: 49-53.
5. Bali SJ, Panda A, Sobti A et al (2012) Prevalence of plateau iris configuration in primary angle closure glaucoma using ultrasound biomicroscopy in the Indian population. Indian J Ophthalmol 60(3): 175–178.
6. Do Tan, Nguyen Xuan Hiep, Dao Lam Huong et al (2017) Ultrasound biomicroscopic diagnosis of angle-closure mechanisms in Vietnamese subjects with unilateral angle-closure glaucoma. Journal of Glaucoma Publish Ahead of Print. J Glaucoma 27(2): 115-120.
7. Tornquist R (1958) Angle-closure glaucoma in an eye with a plateau type of iris. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 36(3): 419-423.