Assessment of risk factors and application of the Laryngoscore in predicting difficulty during rigid endoscopic laryngeal surgery
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Introduction: Multiple factors influence the degree of difficulty in laryngeal exposure during rigid laryngoscopic surgery. In 2024, Piazza et al developed the Laryngoscore to predict the level of difficulty based on various parameters. In Vietnam, there have been no studies addressing this issue. Subject and method: A prospective cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 68 patients undergoing rigid laryngoscopic surgery at the National Otorhinolaryngology Hospital from February 2025 to October 2025. Risk factors were assessed and analyzed using statistical algorithms with SPSS version 22.0. Result: Factors significantly associated with difficult laryngeal exposure during rigid laryngoscopic surgery (p<0.05) included: Male sex, age ≥ 45 years, neck circumference ≥ 33.5cm, prominent thyroid cartilage, macroglossia, BMI ≥ 23, and the need for increased tongue traction during indirect laryngoscopy (grade ≥ 2). The Laryngoscore demonstrated good predictive value with an AUC of 0.810; the optimal cutoff point was 4, yielding a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 75%. Conclusion: The Laryngoscore is an effective tool for predicting the difficulty of laryngeal exposure in rigid laryngoscopic surgery.
Article Details
References
2. Arjun A, Dutta A (2019) A study of application of preoperative clinical predictors of difficult laryngeal exposure for microlaryngoscopy: The Laryngoscore in the Indian population. Indian Journal Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery 71(4): 480-485, doi: 10.1007/s12070-019-01658-2
3. Clarysse C, Meulemans J, van Lierde C, Laenen A, Delaere P, Vander PV (2024) Prospective evaluation and validation of the laryngoscore and the mini‐laryngoscore. Laryngoscope 134(4): 1807-1812, doi: 10.1002/lary.31083
4. Incandela F, Paderno A, Missale F et al (2019) Glottic exposure for transoral laser microsurgery: Proposal of a mini‐version of the laryngoscore. Laryngoscope 129(7): 1617-1622, doi: 10.1002/lary.27525
5. Manjunath M, Sachidananda R, Jyothi Swarup R, Sreenivasa Murthy T (2024) Office Rigid Laryngoscopy as a Predictor for Glottic Exposure in Microlaryngoscopy. Indian Journal Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery 76(2): 1765-1769. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-04403-y
6. Kharrat I, Achour I, Trabelsi JJ et al (2022) Prediction of difficulty in direct laryngoscopy. Scientific Reports 12(1): 10722. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13523-4
7. Wang M, Liu Y, Qiu Y et al (2024) Predictors of difficult laryngeal exposure in suspension laryngoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 17(2): 177-187. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2023.00023
8. Hsiung MW, Pai L, Kang BH, Wang BL, Wong CS (2024) Clinical predictors of difficult laryngeal exposure. Laryngoscope 114(2): 358-363. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200402000-00033
ISSN: 1859 - 2872