predictive value of anterior segment morphology for laser peripheral iridotomy outcome in primary angle closure suspect patients

  • Hà Minh Hữu Tài Bệnh viện Mắt Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
  • Nguyễn Phạm Dũng Trường Đại học Y khoa Phạm Ngọc Thạch

Main Article Content

Keywords

Anterior segment morphology, iris thickness, iris curvature, predictive model

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate changes in anterior segment morphological parameters on gonioscopy and AS-OCT before and after Nd:YAG laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI), and to identify morphological predictors of successful outcome. Subject and method: Cross-sectional analytical study of 70 eyes from 35 primary angle closure suspect (PACS) patients at HCMC Eye Hospital (June 2024–December 2025). Gonioscopy and AS-OCT were performed before and 1 month after LPI. Ten AS-OCT parameters (AOD500, AOD750, TISA500, TISA750, IT500, IT750, IC, IC ratio, LV, ACD) were recorded and analyzed using binary logistic regression. Result: Mean age was 57.24 ± 8.1 years; 91.43% were female. One month post-LPI, all angle-opening parameters (AOD500, AOD750, TISA500, TISA750, ACD) increased significantly (p<0.001), while iris morphology parameters (IT500, IT750, IC, IC ratio) and LV decreased significantly (p<0.001–0.04). The regression model identified AOD500, AOD750, TISA750, LV, and ACD as independent predictors of LPI success, with an overall accuracy of 88.6% and AUC = 0.918. Conclusion: Five pre-operative AS-OCT parameters (AOD500, AOD750, TISA750, LV, ACD) demonstrated high predictive value for LPI success, supporting clinical decision-making in the management of PACS patients.

Article Details

References

1. Đào Thị Phương Linh (2017) Đánh giá sự thay đổi cấu trúc góc tiền phòng sau laser cắt mống mắt chu biên ở bệnh nhân góc tiền phòng hẹp bằng siêu âm sinh hiển vi. Y Học TP Hồ Chí Minh 21(3): 86-96.
2. Sun X, Dai Y, Chen Y et al (2017) Primary angle closure glaucoma: What we know and what we don't know. Prog Retin Eye Res 57: 26-45.
3. George R, Panda S, Vijaya L (2022) Blindness in glaucoma: primary open-angle glaucoma versus primary angle-closure glaucoma a meta-analysis. Eye 36(11): 2099-2105.
4. Koh V, Keshtkaran MR, Hernstadt D et al (2019) Predicting the outcome of laser peripheral iridotomy for primary angle closure suspect eyes using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmologica 97(1): 57-63.
5. He M, Friedman DS, Ge J et al (2007) Laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle-closure suspects: biometric and gonioscopic outcomes: the Liwan Eye Study. Ophthalmology 114(3): 494-500.
6. Desmond T, Tran V, Maharaj M, Carnt N, White A (2022) Diagnostic accuracy of AS-OCT vs gonioscopy for detecting angle closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 260(1): 1-23.
7. Lee KS, Sung KR, Shon K et al (2013) Longitudinal changes in anterior segment parameters after laser peripheral iridotomy assessed by anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54(5): 3166-3170.
8. Helal J, Saad H, Sabry M, Eldorghamy A (2019) Assessment of changes in anterior segment parameters by ultrasound biomicroscopy after laser peripheral iridotomy. Delta J Ophthalmol 20(1): 32-42.
9. Radhakrishnan S, Chen PP, Junk AK, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Chen TC (2018) Laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(7):1110-1120.
10. Gao X, Zhou Y, Zuo C et al (2021) Predictive equation for angle opening distance at 750 μm after laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure suspects. Front Med 8: 1329.