Clinical, paraclinical, and intraoperative characteristics of anatomical laparoscopic liver resection using indocyanine green fluorescence for hepatocellular carcinoma
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Objective: To describe the preoperative clinical and paraclinical characteristics and to evaluate intraoperative outcomes of laparoscopic anatomical liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma using Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence guidance. Subject and method: This was a prospective, single-arm interventional study conducted on 50 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent laparoscopic anatomical liver resection with ICG fluorescence guidance at 108 Military Central Hospital from December 2024 to December 2025. Variables analyzed included preoperative clinical, paraclinical, and imaging characteristics, as well as intraoperative parameters. Results: The mean age was 59.2 ± 10.0 years, with males accounting for 88.0%. The prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C infection was 70.0% and 8.0%, respectively. All patients were classified as Child-Pugh class A. On CT imaging, 88.0% of patients had cirrhosis, and 88.0% presented with a solitary tumor. The mean maximum tumor size was 43.1 ± 23.2 mm. The mean serum AFP level was 224.91 ± 463.41 ng/mL, and the mean PIVKA-II level was 1748.39 ± 6029.74 mAU/mL. Intraoperatively, cirrhotic liver parenchyma was observed in 68.0% of patients, and 76.0% of tumors were located superficially. ICG fluorescence provided clear visualization in 100% of cases, with no recorded adverse reactions. The mean operative time was 137.0 ± 52.2 minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 173.0 ± 149.3 mL. One patient (2.0%) required intraoperative blood transfusion. No cases required conversion to open surgery, and no anatomical complications were reported. Conclusion: Laparoscopic anatomical liver resection using ICG fluorescence guidance for hepatocellular carcinoma is a feasible and safe approach. This technique provides effective intraoperative navigation, with a high fluorescence detection rate, low blood loss, low transfusion rate, and no observed conversion to open surgery or anatomical complications in this series.
Article Details
References
2. Reig M, Forner A, Rimola J, Ferrer-Fàbrega J, Burrel M, Garcia-Criado Á et al (2022) BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update. J Hepatol 76(3): 681-693. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.018.
3. Singal AG, Llovet JM, Yarchoan M, Mehta N, Heimbach JK, Dawson LA et al (2023) AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 78(6): 1922-1965. doi:10.1097/HEP.0000000000000466.
4. European Association for the Study of the Liver (2025) EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 82(2): 315-374. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.028.
5. Abu Hilal M et al (2018) The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: From Indication to Implementation. Ann Surg 268(1): 11-18. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524.
6. Wakabayashi T, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Abe Y, Dalla Bona E, Nicolini D, Mocchegiani F et al (2022) Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Navigation in Liver Surgery: A Systematic Review on Dose and Timing of Administration. Ann Surg 275(6): 1025-1034. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005406.
7. Zhou K, Zhou S, Du L, Liu E, Dong H, Ma F et al (2024) Safety and effectiveness of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging-guided laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 13: 1309593. doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1309593.
8. Tangsirapat V et al (2024) Surgical margin status outcome of intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence-guided laparoscopic hepatectomy in liver malignancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Surg 24(1): 181. doi:10.1186/s12893-024-02469-1.
9. Hu M, Chen Z, Xu D, Zhang Y, Song G, Huang H et al (2025) Efficacy and safety of indocyanine green fluorescence navigation versus conventional laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 39(3):1681-1695. doi:10.1007/s00464-024-11518-y.
ISSN: 1859 - 2872