Single-stage anterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction: Preliminary outcome evaluation

  • Đỗ Đức Trung Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108
  • Nguyễn Quốc Dũng Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108
  • Nguyễn Văn Tuấn Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108
  • Mai Đức Thuận Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108

Main Article Content

Keywords

ACL revision, patellar tendon autograft.

Abstract

To present early outcomes of single-stage anterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction. Subject and method: 40 patients (mean age 27.9 ± 5.3 years; range 21–54) with postoperative knee laxity after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction underwent single-stage arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament revision. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with the Lysholm score and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grading system. Knee stability was evaluated using the KT-1000 arthrometer and the pivot-shift test. Result: Mean time follow-up was 17.3 months (range 12 - 29). At final assessment, the mean Lysholm score was 89.7 ± 10 (range 61–100). According to the IKDC, 38 patients (95 %) were graded A or B, one patient grade C, and one patient grade D. Mean anterior tibial translation measured by KT-1000 was 2.8 ± 1.4mm (range 0–10.5). The pivot-shift test was negative in 25 patients (62.5 %); it was positive (1+) in 13 cases (32.5 %), (2+) in 1 case (2.5 %), and (3+) in 1 case (2.5 %). Conclusion: Early results of single-stage anterior cruciate ligament revision are encouraging, with good to excellent outcomes in 95 % of patients. Concomitant meniscal or chondral lesions negatively affect results.

Article Details

References

1. MARS Group và MARS Group (2014) Effect of graft choice on the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort. Am J Sports Med 42(10): 2301-2310.
2. Tapasvi S, Shekhar A (2021) Revision ACL Reconstruction: Principles and Practice. Indian J Orthop 55(2): 263–275.
3. Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 10(1): 14-21; discussion 21-22.
4. Koh E, Oe K, Takemura S (2015) Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft to Avoid Harvest-Site Morbidity in Knee Arthroscopy. Arthrosc Tech 4(2): 179-184.
5. Legnani C, Peretti G, Borgo E (2017) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with ipsi- or contralateral hamstring tendon grafts. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 27(4): 533–537.
6. Partan MJ, Nayak R, Patel R (2025) Patellar fracture risk is not affected by harvest length during bone-patellar tendon-bone harvest: A biomechanical and ultimate load-to-failure analysis. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 7(4): 101203.
7. Vermeijden HD, Yang XA, van der List JP 2020) Trauma and femoral tunnel position are the most common failure modes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28(11): 3666-3675.
8. Engler ID, Sylvia SM, Salzler MJ (2022) Single-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Stacked Screws Technique. Arthroscopy Techniques 11(7): 1341-1345.
9. Ernat JJ, Rakowski DR, Millett PJ (2021) Single-stage anterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction using an allograft bone dowel for a malpositioned and widened femoral tunnel. Arthrosc Tech 10(7): 1793-1797.
10. Chougule S, Tselentakis G, Stefan S (2015) Revision of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled semitendinosus allograft: intermediate-term outcome. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25(3): 515-523.
11. Pascual-Garrido C, Carbo L, Makino A (2014) Revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allografts in patients younger than 40 years old: a 2 to 4 year results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(5): 1106-1111.
12. Ueki H, Nakagawa Y, Ohara T (2018) Risk factors for residual pivot shift after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: data from the MAKS group. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(12): 3724-3730.
13. MAKS (2016) Meniscal and Articular Cartilage Predictors of Clinical Outcome Following Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 44(7): 1671-1679.
14. Tischer T, Beaufilis P Becker R (2022) Management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults: the 2022 ESSKA consensus part I-diagnostics and preoperative planning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.
15. de Sa D, Crum RJ, Rabuck S (2021) The REVision using imaging to guide staging and evaluation (revise) in acl reconstruction classification. J Knee Surg 34(5): 509–519.
16. Condello V, Beaufilis P, Becker R (2023) Management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults: the 2022 ESSKA consensus: Part II-surgical strategy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31(11): 4652-4661.