Initial outcomes and factors related to the treatment of non-metastatic metaplastic breast cancer at K Hospital
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the initial outcomes and factors associated with the treatment of non-metastatic metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Subject and method: A descriptive study (combined retrospective and prospective) was conducted on patients with stage I - III MBC at K Hospital from January 2019 to February 2024. Result: A total of 213 MBC patients had a mean age of 52, with the group aged ≥ 40 accounting for the majority (85.2%). Additionally, 133 patients (62.5%) were diagnosed at stage II, followed by 51 patients (23.9%) at stage I, and 29 patients (13.6%) at stage III. Regarding immunohistochemical (IHC) characteristics, the majority of patients presented with triple-negative breast cancer features, accounting for 76.5%; most patients had a Ki67 index ≥ 20%, with 209 patients accounting for 98.1%. The majority of patients underwent upfront surgery (164 patients, 76.9%), while 49 patients (23.1%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median disease-free survival (DFS) of the study group was 48.7 months. Univariate analysis indicated that tumor size, stage at diagnosis, and the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were three prognostic factors for MBC. In multivariate analysis, the treatment strategy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery) was a statistically significant prognostic factor with p<0.001. Conclusion: MBC is an aggressive subtype, often diagnosed at a late stage, with tumors usually presenting at a large size at the time of diagnosis. Metaplastic breast cancer is typically triple-negative, leading to a poor prognosis. Standard treatment methods for breast cancer show limited efficacy in this patient group.
Article Details
References
2. Yigit S, Pehlivan FS, Evcim G, Etit D (2012) Clinicopathologic features of the mixed epithelial and mesenchymal type metaplastic breast carcinoma with myoepithelial differentiation in a subset of six cases. Pathol Res Pract 208(3): 147-150, doi:10,1016/j.prp.2011,12,014
3. El Zein D, Hughes M, Kumar S et al (2017) Metaplastic Carcinoma of the Breast Is More Aggressive Than Triple-negative Breast Cancer: A Study From a Single Institution and Review of Literature. Clin Breast Cancer 17(5): 382-391. doi:10,1016/j.clbc.2017,04,009
4. Shi H, Yu L, Mai J, Zhang P, Fang K (2021) Nomograms predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in metaplastic breast cancer patients. J BUON Off J Balk Union Oncol 26(4):1386-1397.
5. Mao J, Hu J, Zhang Y et al (2021) Single Hormone Receptor-Positive Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Similar Outcome as Triple-Negative Subtype. Front Endocrinol 12: 628939, doi:10,3389/fendo.2021,628939
6, Ovcaricek T, Frkovic SG, Matos E, Mozina B, Borstnar S (2010) Triple negative breast cancer – prognostic factors and survival. Radiol Oncol 45(1): 46-52, doi:10,2478/v10019-010-0054-4
7. Phan KT, Trịnh LH và Phùng TH (2023) Đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng và kết quả điều trị UTV thể dị sản tại Bệnh viện K. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 532, 1 (tháng 11 2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10,51298/vmj.v532i1,7295,
8. Aysola K, Desai A, Welch C et al (2013) Triple Negative Breast Cancer - An Overview. Hered Genet Curr Res (2): 001, doi:10,4172/2161-1041,S2-001
9. Poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in metaplastic breast carcinoma npj Breast Cancer. Accessed July 28, 2024, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41523-021-00302-z
10. Al-Hilli Z, Choong G, Keeney MG et al (2019) Metaplastic breast cancer has a poor response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 176(3): 709-716, doi:10,1007/s10549-019-05264-2
ISSN: 1859 - 2872