Validation of the structural validity and discriminative ability of the VQ11 questionnaire for assessing quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess the construct validity and discriminative ability of the Vietnamese version of the VQ11 questionnaire in measuring quality of life among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Subject and method: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 168 COPD patients at the respiratory outpatient clinic of Thanh Nhan Hospital from April to May 2025. Data were collected using the Vietnamese version of the VQ11 questionnaire through face-to-face interviews. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed to examine the underlying factor structure. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Discriminative validity was evaluated by comparing VQ11 scores between clinical subgroups based on the degree of dyspnea (mMRC) and symptom severity (CAT score). Result: The KMO index was 0.935, and Bartlett’s test was statistically significant (p<0.001), indicating that the data were suitable for EFA. Two main factors were extracted, explaining 74.3% of the total variance. The items clearly clustered into two distinct components. The overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.942, and all items had item-total correlations above 0.3. The median VQ11 score was higher in patients with mMRC ≥ 2 (28.5; IQR: 11) than in those with mMRC < 2 (21.0; IQR: 4); p<0.001. Similarly, patients with CAT ≥ 10 had higher VQ11 scores than those with CAT < 10 (23.0 vs. 20.0; p<0.001). Conclusion: The Vietnamese version of the VQ11 demonstrates a clear two-factor structure, high internal consistency, and good discriminative validity among COPD patients. It is a suitable tool for assessing quality of life in COPD populations in Vietnam.
Article Details
References
2. Aqtam I, Ayed A, Zaben K (2023) Quality of Life: Concept Analysis. Saudi J Nurs Health Care.
3. Dignani L, Toccaceli A, Guarinoni MG, Petrucci C, Lancia L (2015) Quality of Life in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis. Nursing forum 50(3): 201-13. doi:10.1111/nuf.12110.
4. Moradkhani B, Mollazadeh S, Niloofar P, Bashiri A, Oghazian MB (2021) Association between medication adherence and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Pharm Health Care Sci 7(1): 40. doi:10.1186/s40780-021-00222-x.
5. Ninot G, Soyez F, Préfaut C (2013) A short questionnaire for the assessment of quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: psychometric properties of VQ11. Health quality of life outcomes 11: 1-10.
6. Phan Thị Diễm Ca, Reycher G, Nguyễn Như Vinh (2023) Tính giá trị và độ tin cậy của phiên bản Tiếng Việt bộ câu hỏi ngắn VQ11 ở người bệnh mắc bệnh phổi tắc nghẽn mạn tính tại thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam 526(1A).
7. Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ (2003) Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984898.
8. Shrestha N (2021) Factor Analysis as a Tool for Survey Analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics 9(1): 4-11. doi:10.12691/ajams-9-1-2.
9. Yurdugül H (2008) Minimum sample size for Cronbach’s coefficient alpha: A Monte-Carlo study. Hacettepe Üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi dergisi. 35(35):1-9.
10. Hays DG, Wood C (2017) Stepping outside the normed sample: Implications for validity. Measurement Evaluation in Counseling Development 50(4): 282-288.
11. Knaz H, Anane I, Guezguez F, Prefaut C, Ben Saad H (2020) Applicability of the Arabic version of the French quality of life' (QOL) questionnaire (VQ11) in Tunisian patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Revue des maladies respiratoires 37(9): 699-709. doi:10.1016/j.rmr.2020.07.005.
ISSN: 1859 - 2872