ISSN: 1859 - 2872
Results of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy on kidneys previously treated surgically for kidney stones
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the results of kidney stone treatment in patients who had undergone ipsilateral kidney stone surgery using mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy at 108 Military Central Hospital. Subject and method: A retrospective and prospective study of 57 patients who underwent mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy for treatment of kidney stones with a history of kidney stone surgery, at the Urology - Andrology Center of 108 Military Central Hospital. Result: Average age 56.8 ± 11.7 years, male/female ratio 3/1, history of open surgery 49.1%, history of percutaneous nephrolithotomy 59.9%, average stone surface area 294.8 ± 194.4mm2, average S.T.O.N.E 6.5 ± 1.2; average GSS 2.3 ± 10.9. Average surgical time 37.0 ± 10.2 minutes, success rate 100%, stone-free rate 93.0%. Complications: Fever 1.8%, urinary tract infection 1.8%, intraoperative bleeding 3.6%. Conclusion: Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy is a minimally traumatic, effective, and safe method for treating kidney stones in patients who have had surgery for kidney stones on the same side.
Article Details
References
2. Vernet SL, Okhunov Z, Motamedinia P et al (2016) Nephrolithometric scoring systems to predict outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Rev Urol 18(1): 15-27.
3. Penbegul N, Hatipoglu NK, Bodakci MN et al (2013) Ultrasonography in percutaneous renal access in patients with renal anatomic abnormalities. Urology 81(5): 938-942.
4. Smith AD, Preminger GM, Kavoussi LR et al (2019) Smith’s textbook of endourology. Wiley-Blackwell.
5. Okhunov Z, Friedlander JI, George AK et al (2013) S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: Novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi. Urology 81(6): 1154–1160.
6. Eğilmez T, Gören MR, Kliniği Ü et al (2015) Predicting surgical outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Validation of the guy's stone score and nephrolithometric nomogram in terms of success and complications. J Clin Anal Med 6(3): 281-286.
7. Yesil S, Ozturk U, Goktug HNG et al (2013) Previous open renal surgery increased vascular complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) compared with primary and secondary PCNL and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients: A retrospective study. Urol Int 91(3): 331-334.
8. Trương Văn Cẩn (2021) Nghiên cứu điều trị sỏi thận bằng phẫu thuật lấy sỏi thận qua da trên thận đã mổ mở lấy sỏi. Luận án tiến sĩ. Đại học Huế - Trường đại học Y Dược.
9. Ozgor F, Kucuktopcu O, Sarılar O et al (2015) Does previous open renal surgery or percutaneous nephrolithotomy affect the outcomes and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis 43(6): 541-547.
10. Vũ Nguyễn Khải Ca, Hoàng Long, Chu Văn Lâm và cộng sự (2015) Tán sỏi thận qua da bằng đường hầm nhỏ dưới hướng dẫn của siêu âm. Tạp chí Y học TP Hồ Chí Minh 19(4), tr. 277-281.
11. Tefekli A, Karadag MA, Tepeler K et al (2008) Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: Looking for a standard. European Urology 83(1): 184-190.
12. Tsai SH, Chung HJ, Tseng PT et al (2020) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones. A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine 99(10): 19403.
13. Zeng G, Zhang T, Agrawal M (2018) Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1–2cm lower-pole renal calculi: An international multicentre randomised controlled trial. BJU Int 122: 1034-1040.
14. Güler Y (2020) Comparison of RIRS and MiniPCNL for 2-3cm Renal Lower Calyx Stones. Arch Urol 3(1): 007.
15. Phan Tùng Lĩnh (2020) Đánh giá kết quả tán sỏi qua da đường hầm nhỏ điểu trị sỏi thận tái phát. Luận văn chuyên khoa cấp II. Trường Đại Học Y Hà Nội.
Article Sidebar
