The value of CHIP score in risk stratification in patients with high-risk complex coronary artery lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of the CHIP score for major cardiovascular events and mortality in patients having coronary intervention who have high-risk complicated coronary artery lesions, one year after the intervention. Subject and method: Cross-sectional descriptive study on 56 patients with chronic coronary syndrome and complex and high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from March 2021-August 2021. Evaluate the CHIP score with 4 criteria: Age > 80 (3 points), dialysis (6 points), left ventricular ejection fraction < 30% (2 points), and number of treated lesions >2 (2 points). There are three categories of scoring: low risk (0 points), medium risk (2–3), and high risk (≥4). The overall score is 13 points. Evaluate the prognosis of major cardiovascular events and mortality in the hospital and 1 year after discharge. Result: CHIP score had good predictive value for death and in-hospital major cardiovascular events (AUC = 0.98 and CI: 0.95-1.0), equivalent to Syntax and Syntax 2 scores; moderate prognosis of death 1 year after intervention (AUC = 0.74 and CI: 0.49-1.0), equivalent to Syntax score and Syntax 2 score; moderate predictive value for major cardiovascular events 1 year after intervention (AUC = 0.74 and CI: 0.61–0.89), better than the Syntax score and equivalent to the Syntax 2 score. Conclusion: In patients with complex and high-risk chronic coronary syndrome and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, the CHIP score exhibited predictive value for in-hospital mortality and major cardiovascular events one year after discharge.
Article Details
References
2. Kinnaird T, Kwok CS, Kontopantelis E et al (2016) Incidence, determinants, and outcomes of coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention in the United Kingdom between 2006 and 2013: An analysis of 527 121 cases from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 9(8):e003449.
3. Stone GW, Brodie BR, Griffin JJ et al (1998) Prospective, multicenter study of the safety and feasibility of primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: in-hospital and 30-day results of the PAMI stent pilot trial. Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Stent Pilot Trial Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 31(1): 23-30.
4. Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW et al (2018) Heart disease and stroke statistics 2018 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 137(12):e67-e492. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558.
5. Brener SJ, Cunn GJ, Desai PH et al (2021) A novel risk score to predict one-year mortality in patients undergoing complex high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI). J Invasive Cardiol 33(4):E253-E258.
6. Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP et al (2005) The SYNTAX Score: An angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 1(2):219-227.
7. Song Y, Gao Z, Tang X et al, Usefulness of the SYNTAX score II to validate 2‐year outcomes in patients with complex coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A large single‐center study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 92(1):40-47.
8. Choi BG, Rha SW, Yoon SG, Choi CU, Lee MW, Kim SWJJotAHA (2019) Association of major adverse cardiac events up to 5 years in patients with chest pain without significant coronary artery disease in the Korean population. J Am Heart Assoc 8(12): 010541.
9. Kinnaird T, Gallagher S, Spratt JC et al (2020) Complex high-risk and indicated percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina: Does operator volume influence patient outcome? Am Heart J. 222: 15-25.
10. Nozue T, Kamijima R, Iwaki T, Michishita IJAJoCD (2012) Impact of SYNTAX score on 1-year clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery. Am J Cardiovasc Dis 2(3): 216.