Study of diffusion tensor imaging and renal perfusion in transplanted kidneys using 3.0Tesla MRI
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Objective: To study Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) and renal perfusion MRI in transplanted kidneys. Subject and method: The study included 45 patients with 45 transplanted kidneys, who underwent kidney transplantation at 108 Military Central Hospital between 2019 and 2023. Among them, 32 were male and 13 were female, with an average age of 39.41 ± 12.31 years for males and 40.92 ± 11.43 years for females. All patients underwent MRI using a 3.0T system (GE) in a cross-sectional descriptive study. Result: The average volume of the transplanted kidney was 160.9 ± 42.9ml. The average number of fiber bundles was 16,147.91 ± 5,022.04. The mean FA value for the entire kidney was 0.32 ± 0.04, and ADC was 2.26 ± 0.26. The FA values for the cortex of the transplanted kidney at the upper pole, mid-region, and lower pole were 0.24, 0.22, and 0.21, respectively. The corresponding ADC values were 2.62, 2.72, and 2.61. For the medulla, the FA values at the upper pole, mid-region, and lower pole were 0.46, 0.45, and 0.45, respectively. The corresponding ADC values were 2.60, 2.50, and 2.40. The average RBF in the renal cortex was higher than in the renal medulla across all regions. A positive correlation was found between medullary FA and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (correlation coefficient r = 0.54, p<0.001), as well as between eGFR and medullary RBF (r = 0.3, p<0.05). Conclusion: Diffusion Tensor Imaging and non-contrast renal perfusion MRI represent valuable non-invasive diagnostic modalities for the early detection of post-transplant kidney injury. The FA and ADC parameters are instrumental in detecting and evaluating the structural integrity of the renal parenchyma and the diffusion of water within the transplanted kidney tissue. The RBF values enable the assessment of renal perfusion without the need for contrast agents, which can potentially compromise graft function.
Article Details
References
2. Mukherjee P, Berman JI, Chung SW, Hess CP, Henry RG (2008) Diffusion tensor MR imaging and fiber tractography: Theoretic underpinnings. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology 29(4): 632-641. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1051.
3. Odudu A, Nery F, Harteveld AA et al (2018) Arterial spin labelling MRI to measure renal perfusion: A systematic review and statement paper. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation: Official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association 33(2): 15-21. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfy180.
4. Đỗ Tất Cường, Bùi Văn Mạnh, Hoàng Mạnh An (2012) Kết quả ghép thận và một số biến chứng qua 98 ca ghép thận tại Bệnh viện Quân y 103. Tạp chí Y Dược học Quân sự, 5, tr. 1-6.
5. Fan WJ, Ren T, Li Q et al (2016) Assessment of renal allograft function early after transplantation with isotropic resolution diffusion tensor imaging. European radiology. Eur Radiol 26(2): 567-575. doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3841-x.
6. Cakmak P, Yağcı AB, Dursun B, Herek D, Fenkçi SM (2014) Renal diffusion-weighted imaging in diabetic nephropathy: Correlation with clinical stages of disease. Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) 20(5): 374-378. doi:10.5152/dir.2014.13513.