Studying the variation of red cell distribution and prognostic value of motalyti among septic shock patients

  • Vũ Anh Đức Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108
  • Lê Lan Phương Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108
  • Trần Quốc Việt Bệnh viện Quân y 175
  • Phạm Thái Dũng Bệnh viện Quân y 103
  • Bùi Văn Mạnh Bệnh viện Quân y 103
  • Hoàng Tiến Tuyên
  • Nguyễn Trung Kiên Bệnh viện Quân y 103

Main Article Content

Keywords

RDW, septic shock mortality prognosis

Abstract

Objective: To assess the variation of red cell distribution width (RDW) in septic shock patients and its association with mortality prognosis in septic shock patients. Subject and method: A prospective longitudinal descriptive study, with 97 patients at the Intensive Care Unit of 108 Military Central Hospital from April 2023 to January 2024. Patients ≥ 18 years old, diagnosed with septic shock according to SCCM/ESICM 2016 criteria. RDW index measured at the time of septic shock diagnosis, on days 1, 3, 5, 7 after septic shock diagnosis. Assess the variation of RDW and prognostic value of RDW for mortality to compare with SOFA and APACHE II scores in septic shock patients. Result: The average RDW index in the deceased patient group was higher than in the surviving patient group (p<0.01). RDW index at T7 (AUC = 0.9, p<0.001) with a cutoff of 17% had a higher value than both SOFA and APACHE II scores in predicting mortality with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 89.5%. RDW in the deceased patient group was higher than in the surviving patient group from T0 to T7 (p<0.01). In the deceased patient group, this index notably increased at T5 (16.8%) and T7 (18.7%). In the surviving patient group, RDW showed less variation during the study periods with average values ranging from 14.4 ± 1.4% to 15.1 ± 1.78% (p<0.05). Conclusion: The RDW index at various study time points with cutoffs of 14.9-17%, as well as the gradually increasing variability of this index, have significant value in predicting mortality in patients with septic shock compared to the SOFA and APACHE II scores (p<0.05).

Article Details

References

1. Hammond NE, Kumar A, Kaur P, Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan BK, Ghosh A, Grattan S, Jha V, Mathai D, Venkatesh B; Sepsis in India Prevalence Study (SIPS) Investigator Network (2022) Estimates of sepsis prevalence and outcomes in adult patients in the ICU in India: A cross-sectional study. Chest 161(6):1543-1554. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.12.673.
2. Kopczynska M, Sharif B, Cleaver S et al (2018) Red-flag sepsis and SOFA identifies different patient population at risk of sepsis-related deaths on the general ward. Medicine (Baltimore) 97(49): 13238.
3. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W et al (2017) Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Crit Care Med 45: 486-552.
4. Do SN, Dao CX, Nguyen TA et al (2023) Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score for predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units: A multicentre, cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 13(3): p064870.
5. Sadaka F, EthmaneAbouElMaali C, Cytron MA et al (2017) Predicting mortality of patients with sepsis: A comparison of APACHE II and APACHE III scoring systems. J Clin Med Res 9(11): 907-910.
6. Meka M, Raveesha A, Kalyani R (2022) Prognostic importance of red cell distribution width, mean platelet volume and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio among sepsis patients at a tertiary setting in Kolar, South India. J Clin of DiagnRes 16(4): EC23EC27. https://www.doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52240/16203.
7. Pavan MR, Hande MH, Jeganathan J, Shetty M & Chakrapani M (2021) Role of red cell distribution width and neutrophil: Lymphocyte ratio in adults with sepsis. International Journal of Current Research and Review 13(3), 53. https://doi.org/10.31782/IJCRR.2021.13317.
8. Deniz M, Ozgun P, and Ozdemir E (2022) Relationships between RDW, NLR, CAR, and APACHE II scores in the context of predicting the prognosis and mortality in ICU patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 26(12): 4258-4267.
9. Cao C, Yu M, and Chai Y (2019) Pathological alteration and therapeutic implications of sepsis-induced immune cell apoptosis. Cell Death & Disease 10(10): 782.
10. Moreno-Torres V, Royuela A, Múñez-Rubio E et al (2022) Red blood cell distribution width as prognostic factor in sepsis: A new use for a classical parameter. Journal of Critical Care 71: 154069.
11. Fawzy M, Gawesh M, Abdelsamie S et al (2023) Evaluation of Dynamic variation in red cell distribution width as a septic marker in comparison with procalcitonin levels and clinical scores in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a prospective observational study. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences 11(B): 38-45.
12. Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ et al (2016) Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: For the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). Jama 315(8): 762-774.