Clinical and paraclinical characteristics in endoscopic intragastric balloon patients for obesity treatment

  • Nguyễn Ngọc Thành Bệnh viện Triều An TP. Hồ Chí Minh
  • Lưu Ngân Tâm Bệnh viện Triều An TP. Hồ Chí Minh
  • Vũ Văn Khiên Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108

Main Article Content

Keywords

Obesity, clinical, paraclinical

Abstract

Objective: Evaluation of clinical, subclinical characteristics and comorbidities in obese patients. Subject and method: Patients aged 18-60 years old. BMI ≥ 30kg/m2 with combination: High blood presure, diabetes, dyslipidemia... or BMI ≥ 35kg/m2. Parameters to be monitored: Age, gender, clinical features, weight, BMI, comorbidities... Result: Obesity patients < 30 years old accounted for the most proportion: 52.8%. Mean age was: 30 ± 9. Female/male: 49/23 (2.1). Obesity grade 1, 2 and 3 accounted for the corresponding rate: 56.9%, 25.0% and 18.1%. The mean BMI was: 35.3 ± 4.8kg/m2. Average weight: 93.5 ± 19.8 (kg). Dyslipidemia accounted for the highest percentage: 70.8%, hypertension: 37.5%. Conclusion: Obesity has high comorbidities and requires active treatment.

Article Details

References

1. Endalifer ML, Diress G (2020) Epidemiology, predisposing factors, biomarkers, and prevention mechanism of obesity: A systematic review. Hindawi Journal of Obesity, Article ID 6134362, 8 page
2. Bùi Thanh Phúc (2021) Nghiên cứu ứng dụng phẫu thuật nội soi đặt vòng thắt dạ dày điều trị béo phì. Luận án Tiến sỹ y học. Đại học Y Hà Nội 2021.
3. Genco A, Bruni T, Doldi SB et al (2005) Bioenterics intragastric balloon: The italian experience with 2,515 patient. Obes Surg 15(8): 1161-1164.
4. Toolabi K, Golzarand M, Farid R (2016) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: Efficacy and consequences over a 13-year period. Am J Surg 212(1): 62-68.
5. Trujillo MR, Muller D, Widmer JD, Warschkow R, Muller MK (2016) Long-term follow-up of gastric banding 10 years and beyond. Obes Surg 26(3): 581-587.
6. Froylich D, Abramovich-Segal T, Pascal G, Haskins I, Appel B, Kafri N, Hazzan D (2018) Long-term (over 10 years) retrospective follow-up of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg 28(4): 976-980.
7. Ohta M, Kitano S, Kai S, Shiromizu A, Iwashita Y, Endo Y, Kawano Y, Masaki T, Kakuma T, Yoshimatsu H (2013) Initial Japanese experience with the LAP-BAND system. Asian J Endosc Surg 6(1): 39-43.
8. Liu XZ, Yin K, Fan J, Shen XJ, Xu MJ, Wang WH, Zhang YG, Zheng CZ, Zou da J (2015) Long-Term outcomes and experience of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: One center's results in China. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11(4): 855-859.
9. Kowalewski PK, Olszewski R, Walędziak MS, Janik MR, Kwiatkowski A, Gałązka-Świderek N, Cichoń K, Brągoszewski J, Paśnik K (2018) Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy-a Single-Center, Retrospective Study. Obes Surg 28(1):130-134. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2795-2.
10. Stroh C, Hohmann U, Schramm H et al (2011) Fourteen-year long-term results after gastric banding. J Obes: 128451.
11. Patkar A, Fegelman E, R Kashyap S, Brethauer S, Bour E, Yoo A, Li G (2017) Assessing the real-world effect of laparoscopic bariatric surgery on the management of obesity-related comorbidities: A retrospective matched cohort study using a US Claims Database. Diabetes Obes Metab 19(2): 181-188.
12. Lee SK, Heo Y, Park JM, Kim YJ, Kim SM, Park do J, Han SM, Shim KW, Lee YJ, Lee JY, Kwon JW (2016) Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs. Sleeve Gastrectomy vs. Gastric Banding: The first multicenter retrospective comparative cohort study in Obese Korean Patients. Yonsei Med J 57(4): 956-962.