Results of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in stage II, III esophageal cancer at Ho Chi Minh City Oncology Hospital
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Objective: To describe some clinical characteristics and evaluate results of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable stage II, III esophageal cancer at Ho Chi Minh City Oncology Hospital. Subject and method: A case series of 27 patients with resectable stage II, III esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with a weekly regimen of paclitaxel/carboplatin (paclitaxel 50mg/m2, carboplatin AUC 2) for 5 weeks and concurrent radiotherapy (41.4Gy in 23 fractions), followed by esophagectomy. Result: The mean age was 57 years old, the percentage of male was 100%. The most common symptom was dysphagia (88.9%). Weight loss was observed in 66.7% of patients. The mean length of tumor was 5.5 ± 2cm. The majority of patients were in stage III (66.7%). After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the overall clinical response rate reached 92.6%. The complete response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria was 18.5%. There were 74.1% of patients undergoing esophagectomy. The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 40% and R0 resection rate was 95%. The complete tumor regression was achieved in 50% of patients. The common toxic effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy are leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, esophagitis, radiation pneumonitis. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment with negligible adverse-event rates for patients with resectable stage II, III esophageal cancer.
Article Details
References
2. Nguyễn Quốc Bảo (2017) Hóa - xạ trị đồng thời ung thư thực quản. Luận án bác sĩ chuyên khoa cấp II. Đại học Y Dược Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.
3. Nguyễn Thị Hà, Trịnh Lê Huy (2021) Kết quả hóa xạ trị tiền phẫu ung thư thực quản 1/3 giữa - dưới giai đoạn II, III tại Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam tập 206 số 1.
4. (2009) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. National Institutes of Health - National Cancer Institute.
5. de Gouw DJJM, Klarenbeek BR, Driessen M et al (2019) Detecting Pathological Complete Response in Esophageal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Therapy Based on Imaging Techniques: A Diagnostic Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 14(7): 1156-1171.
6. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2): 228-247.
7. Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC et al (1994) Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer 73(11): 2680-2686.
8. van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ et al (2012) Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal or Junctional Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 366(22): 2074-2084.
9. Wang ZY, Jiang YZ, Xiao W, Xue XB, Zhang XW, Zhang L (2021) Prognostic impact of tumor length in esophageal Cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 21(1): 988.
10. Yang H, Liu H, Chen Y et al (2018) Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus (NEOCRTEC5010): A Phase III Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial. Journal of clinical oncology 36(27): 2796-2803.