Correlation of axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging and clinical symptoms in degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis

  • Vi Truong Son Phu Tho Provincial General Hospital
  • Nguyen Van Son Phu Tho Provincial General Hospital
  • Phan Trong Hau 108 Military Central Hospital

Main Article Content

Keywords

Spinal canal, axial loaded magnetic resonance image, lumbar spinal canal stenosis

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether the dural cross-section area (DCSA) and anteroposterior diameter (APD) in axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) correlates with the severity of clinical symptoms in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS). Subject and method: From March 2015 to September 2016 the research was performed on 62 patients with LSCS, DCSA and APD in conventional MRI, axial loaded MRI, and changes in the DCSA and APD were determined at the single most constricted intervertebral level. The severity of symptoms was evaluated on the basis of the walking distance, visual analogue scale (VAS) of leg pain, back pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and ODI (Oswestry Disability Index 2.0). Spearman correlations of the DCSA and APD in conventional MRI, axial loaded MRI, and changes in the DCSA and APD with the severity of symptoms were analyzed. Result: 62 patients with LSCS (25 men and 37 women, 32 - 81 years, median age, 57.61 ± 9.6 years), VAS back pain: 6.0 ± 1.03, VAS leg pain: 6.64 ± 1.32, ODI: 69.23 ± 5.52. JOA: 10.03 ± 1.35, walking distance: 0.48 ± 0.47. The changes in the DCSA and APD were determined at the single most constricted intervertebral level APD: 0.72 ± 1.02mm; DCSA: 13.72 ± 1.42mm². We found there was correlation clearly between the DCSA and APD in axial loaded MRI with the severity of symptoms (VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, JOA and walking distance). Conclusion: The change of DCSA and APD at the single most constricted intervertebral level was significantly different between conventional MRI and axial loaded MRI. Moreover, there was correlation clearly between the DCSA and APD in axial loaded MRI with the severity of symptoms.

Article Details

References

1. Danielson BI, Willén J, Gaulitz A et al (1998) Axial loading of the spine fails to detect radiologic Fi Ndings Thatindicate worsening of during CT and MR in patients with suspected lumbar spinal symptoms. Acta Radiol 39: 604-611.
2. Hiwatashi, Akio, Barbro D, Toshio M, Robert SB, Thomas GR, Webster HP, and Per-Lennart W (2004) Axial loading during MR imaging can influence treatment decision for symptomatic spinal stenosis. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology 25(2): 170-174.
3. Iwatsuki, Koichi, Toshiki Y, and Masanori A (2007) Bilateral interlaminar fenestration and unroofing for the decompression of nerve roots by using a unilateral approach in lumbar canal stenosis. Surgical Neurology 68(5): 487-492.
4. Kanno, Haruo, Hiroshi O, Yutaka K, Naoki M, Toshimi A, Takashi K, Yushin I, and Eiji Itoi (2012) Dynamic change of dural sac cross-sectional area in axial loaded magnetic resonance Imaging correlates with the severity of clinical symptoms in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine 37(3): 207-213.
5. Kuittinen, Pekka, Petri S, Tapani S, Timo JA, Sanna S, Sakari S, Heikki K, Veli T, Ville L, and Olavi A (2014) Visually assessed severity of lumbar spinal canal stenosis is paradoxically associated with leg pain and objective walking ability. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 15: 348.
6. Sirvanci, Mustafa, Mona B, Kursat AG, Cihan D, Mehmet T, Cagatay O, Mehmet A, and Azmi H (2008) Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: Correlation with oswestry disability index and MR Imaging. European Spine Journal 17(5): 679-685.
7. Splettstosser, Annina, Fawad Khan M, Bernd Z, Thomas JV, Hanns A, Middendorp M, Maataoui A (2017) Correlation of lumbar lateral recess stenosis in magnetic resonance imaging and clinical symptoms. World Journal of Radiology 9(5): 223-229.
8. Usman, Muhammad, Mumtaz A, Khanzada K, Mohammad I, Naeem-ul-Haq, Raza A, and Mohammad A (2013) Unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: A minimal invasive surgery. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan 23(12): 852-856.
9. Wang, Yung-Cheng, Chin-Ming Jeng, Chau-Ying Wu, Hsio-Yun Chang, Yong-Chien Huang, Yu-Jen Wang, and Pa-Chun Wang (2008) Dynamic effects of axial loading on the lumbar spine during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected spinal stenosis. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 107(4): 334-339.
10. Willen J and B Danielson (2001) The diagnostic effect from axial loading of the lumbar spine during computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with degenerative disorders. Spine 26(23): 2607-2614.