Cost-effectiveness of ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in premenopausal and perimenopausal women with advanced HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer

  • Kiều Thị Tuyết Mai Trường Đại học Dược Hà Nội
  • Nguyễn Thị Hà Trường Đại học Khoa học Sức khỏe
  • Nguyễn Thị Lan Phương Trường Đại học Khoa học Sức khỏe
  • Đinh Thị Doan Trường Đại học Dược Hà Nội
  • Lê Thu Thủy Trường Đại học Dược Hà Nội
  • Đỗ Xuân Thắng Trường Đại học Dược Hà Nội

Main Article Content

Keywords

Breast cancer, HR-positive - HER2-negative, premenopausal, cost-effectiveness, ribociclib

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ribociclib in combination with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) plus goserelin versus NSAI plus goserelin alone for the treatment of premenopausal patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer in Vietnam. Subject and method: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a hypothetical cohort of premenopausal and perimenopausal women with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer. A partitioned survival model with three health states (progression-free, progressed disease, and death) was adopted with a 28-day cycle length, lifetime time horizon, and payer perspective of the Vietnamese Social Health Insurance (SHI). Model inputs were sourced from published literature and expert consultation. Result: Compared with NSAI + goserelin, adding ribociclib yielded an additional 1.44 QALYs at an incremental cost of VND 630 million, resulting in an ICER of VND 438 million per QALY gained (≈3.8 times GDP per capita in 2024). Assuming SHI co-payment levels of 80%, 70%, and 60%, ICERs decreased to 363, 325 and 288 million VND/QALY, corresponding to 3.2, 2.9 and 2.5 times GDP per capita, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that at a willingness-to-pay threshold of ≥ 433 million VND/QALY, the probability of cost-effectiveness exceeds 50%. Conclusion: Ribociclib plus NSAI and goserelin is unlikely to be cost-effective under full reimbursement. However, under a 60 - 80% SHI co-payment scheme, the ICER falls below 3.2 times GDP per capita - approaching commonly accepted thresholds in Vietnam. Therefore, ribociclib may be considered a conditionally cost-effective option under a shared reimbursement mechanism.

Article Details

References

1. Quyết định số 3128/QĐ-BYT: Hướng dẫn chẩn đoán và điều trị ung thư vú (2020).
2. Global cancer. Viet Nam - Global Cancer Observatory. 24 January, 2023. Accessed 24 January, 2023. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/704-viet-nam-fact-sheets.pdf
3. Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, et al (2015) Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of oncology 26: 8-30.
4. Lobbezoo DJ, van Kampen RJ, Voogd AC et al (2013) Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer subtypes: The hormone receptor/HER2-positive subtype is associated with the most favorable outcome. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2013;141:507-514.
5. Partridge AH, Hughes ME, Warner ET et al (2016) Subtype-dependent relationship between young age at diagnosis and breast cancer survival. Journal of Clinical Oncology 34(27): 3308-3314.
6. Lee MK, Varzi LA, Chung DU et al (2015) The effect of young age in hormone receptor positive breast cancer. BioMed Research International. 2015(1): 325715.
7. Tripathy D, Im SA, Colleoni M et al (2018) Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer (MONALEESA-7): A randomised phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 19(7): 904-915. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30292-4
8. Lu YS, Im SA, Colleoni M et al (2022) Updated Overall Survival of Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy versus Endocrine Therapy Alone in Pre- and Perimenopausal Patients with HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer in MONALEESA-7: A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 28(5): 851-859. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-21-3032
9. Cardoso F, Paluch-Shimon S, Schumacher-Wulf E, et al (2024) 6th and 7th International consensus guidelines for the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC guidelines 6 and 7). The Breast 76. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2024.103756
10. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). Breast cancer Version 5.2024 October 15, 2024.
11. Oncology. ASoC. ASCO Guidelines, Tools, & Resources. https://society.asco.org/practice-patients/guidelines
12. Beth Woods ES, Stephen Palmer, Nick Latimer, Marta Soares (2017) Nice dsu technical support document 19: Partitioned survival analysis for decision modelling in health care: A critical review.
13. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Ribociclib with fulvestrant for treating hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer. 2019. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta593/resources/ribociclib-with-fulvestrant-for-treating-hormone-receptorpositive-her2negative-advanced-breast-cancer-pdf-82607262057925
14. Stellato D, Thabane ME, Chandiwana D, Park J, Delea TE (2021) Cost Effectiveness of Ribociclib Plus a Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Pre-/Perimenopausal, HR+ and HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer: A Canadian Healthcare Perspective. Pharmacoeconomics 39(7): 853-867. doi:10.1007/s40273-021-01028-3
15. Lloyd A, Nafees B, Narewska J, Dewilde S, Watkins J (2006) Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer. British journal of cancer 95(6): 683-690.
16. Huang X, Lin S, Rao X et al (2021) First-line Treatment with Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy for Premenopausal Women with Hormone-receptor-positive Advanced Breast Cancer: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis. Clinical breast cancer. Aug 21(4): 479-488. doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2021.01.019
17. Jeong E, Wang C, Wilson L, Zhong L (2021) Cost-Effectiveness of Adding Ribociclib to Endocrine Therapy for Patients With HR-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer Among Premenopausal or Perimenopausal Women. Frontiers in oncology 11: 658054. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.658054
18. Le V, Zhong L, Narsipur N et al (2021) Cost-effectiveness of ribociclib plus endocrine therapy versus placebo plus endocrine therapy in HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy 27(3): 327-338. doi:10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.3.327
19. Loke L, Lee SC, Pearce F, Ng K, Aziz MIA (2021) Cost-effectiveness of ribociclib as initial treatment for premenopausal women with advanced breast cancer in Singapore. Cancer reports (Hoboken, NJ) 4(1): 1308. doi:10.1002/cnr2.1308
20. Rosa DD, Magliano C, Simon SD et al (2022) Cost-effectiveness of ribociclib for premenopausal or perimenopausal women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: A Brazilian public health care system perspective. Therapeutic advances in medical oncology. 14: 17588359221100865. doi:10.1177/17588359221100865