Evaluation of results of non-operative management of spleen rupture due to blunt abdominal trauma at 108 Military Central Hospital

  • Vũ Văn Quang Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108
  • Lê Văn Thành Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108
  • Nguyễn Hoàng Ngọc Anh Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108

Main Article Content

Keywords

Blunt abdominal trauma, spleen rupture, non-operative management

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the results of non-operative management of blunt spleen trauma. Subject and method: This study was conducted descriptively, retrospective, and prospectively without a control group of the cases who non-operative management of blunt spleen trauma from June 2015 to January 2021 at 108 Military Central Hospital. Result: A total of 161 patients were admitted with blunt spleen trauma; 142 were treated with non-operative management and 19 with emergency splenectomy. The mean age was 37.42 ± 14.83 years old, the male/female ratio was 3.3, a traffic accident was the main cause of spleen rupture (73.95%). Clinical symptoms: Abdominal pain (100%), abdominal distention (73.24%), abdominal wall injury (58.45%), and peritoneal tenderness (13.38%); the most common associated injury was blunt chest trauma (12.97%). Ultrasound: Fluid abdomen (92.96%), parenchymal lesions (69.01%). Computed tomography: Abdominal fluid (96.48%), location of splenic rupture (78.87%), intrasplenic hematoma (53.52%), subcapsular hematoma (10.56%), and contrast blush (2.82%), grade II and III splenic rupture accounted for the majority with rates of 26.76% and 59.86%, respectively. Successful non-operative management: 140 (98.59%) patients and 02 (1.41%) patients failed had to switch to splenectomy. The proportion of patients requiring blood transfusion (29.58%). The average length of hospital stay was 8.47 ± 3.97 days. Conclusion: Non-operative management of splenic rupture due to blunt abdominal trauma is safe and effective with a high success rate

Article Details

References

1. Maung AA, Kaplan JL (2021) Management of splenic injury in the adult trauma patient. www.uptodate.com.
2. Zarzaur BL, Rozycki GS (2017) An update on nonoperative management of the spleen in adults. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2: 1-7.
3. Roy P, Mukherjee R, Parik M (2018) Splenic trauma in the twenty-first century: Changing trends in management. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 100: 650-656.
4. Trần Ngọc Dũng (2019) Nghiên cứu điều trị không mổ vỡ lách trong chấn thương bụng kín tại Bệnh viện hữu nghị Việt Đức. Luận án tiến sỹ y học, Đại học Y Hà Nội.
5. Trần Văn Đáng (2010) Nghiên cứu chỉ định và kết quả điều trị bảo tồn vỡ lách do chấn thương bụng kín tại Bệnh viện đa khoa tỉnh Bình Dương. Luận án tiến sỹ y học, Học viện Quân y.
6. AAST injury scaling and scoring system (2002). Spleen injury scale. Table 7 (1994).
7. Jabbour G, Al-Hassani A, El-Menyar A, Abdelrahman H, Peralta R, Ellabib M, Al-Jogol H, Asim M, Al-Thani H (2017) Clinical and radiological presentations and management of blunt splenic trauma: A Single Tertiary Hospital Experience. Med Sci Monit 23: 3383-3392.
8. Teuben MP, Spijkerman R, Blokhuis TJ, Pfeifer R, Teuber H, et al (2018) Safety of selective nonoperative management for blunt splenic trauma: The impact of concomitant injuries. Patient Safety in Surgery 12: 32.
9. Coccolini F, Fugazzola P, Morganti L et al (2019) The World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) spleen trauma classification: A useful tool in the management of splenic trauma. World Journal of Emergency Surgery 14: 30.
10. Tugnoli G, Bianchi E, Biscardi et al (2015) Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in adults: There is (still) a long way to go. The results of the Bologna‐Maggiore Hospital trauma center experience and development of a clinical algorithm. Surg Today 45: 1210-1217.