ISSN: 1859 - 2872
The results of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty
Main Article Content
Keywords
Surgical result, total knee replacement, posterior cruciate ligament-retaining
Abstract
Objective: To comment on the results of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty for treatment knee degeneration. Subject and method: 103 patients (83 females, 20 males) with 113 knees had been total replaced from 2/2016 to 6/2019, age from 48 to 84 years old (average: 67.7). The mean follow up was 27.9 months (from 6 to 46 months). Result: The results were evaluated according to KSSS score, with 78.8% excellent, 15.9% good, 5.3% and fair and poor 0%. Conclusion: The results from the use of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty was satisfactory.
Article Details
References
1. Đoàn Việt Quân (2013) Nghiên cứu điều trị thoái khớp gối bằng phẫu thuật thay khớp gối toàn phần tại Bệnh viện Việt Đức. Luận văn tốt nghiệp Bác sĩ chuyên khoa II.
2. Beaupre LA, Sharifi B, Johnston DWC (2017) A randomized clinical trial comparing posterior cruciate-stabilizing vs posterior cruciate-retaining prostheses in primary total knee arthroplasty: 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 32(3): 818-823.
3. Gill GS, Joshi AB (2001) Longterm results of cemented, posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. Am J Knee Surg 14(4): 209-214.
4. Madhav C, Ankur BB et al (2014) Prevalence and predictors of post-operative coronal alignment outliers and their association with the functional outcomes in navigated total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 29(12): 2357-2362.
5. Ranawat CS, Ranawat AS (2012) The history of total knee arthroplasty. Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty, Springer: 699-707.
6. Shenoy R, Pastides PS et al (2013) Biomechanics of the knee and TKR. Orthopaedics and Trauma 27(6): 364-371.
7. Yuichiro S, Sawai T et al (2012) Perioperative risk factors for deep vein thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 24: 531-536.
8. Zhang B, Cheng CK, Qu TB et al (2016) Partial versus intact posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty: A comparative study of early clinical outcomes. Orthop Surg 8(3): 331-337.
2. Beaupre LA, Sharifi B, Johnston DWC (2017) A randomized clinical trial comparing posterior cruciate-stabilizing vs posterior cruciate-retaining prostheses in primary total knee arthroplasty: 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 32(3): 818-823.
3. Gill GS, Joshi AB (2001) Longterm results of cemented, posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. Am J Knee Surg 14(4): 209-214.
4. Madhav C, Ankur BB et al (2014) Prevalence and predictors of post-operative coronal alignment outliers and their association with the functional outcomes in navigated total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 29(12): 2357-2362.
5. Ranawat CS, Ranawat AS (2012) The history of total knee arthroplasty. Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty, Springer: 699-707.
6. Shenoy R, Pastides PS et al (2013) Biomechanics of the knee and TKR. Orthopaedics and Trauma 27(6): 364-371.
7. Yuichiro S, Sawai T et al (2012) Perioperative risk factors for deep vein thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 24: 531-536.
8. Zhang B, Cheng CK, Qu TB et al (2016) Partial versus intact posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty: A comparative study of early clinical outcomes. Orthop Surg 8(3): 331-337.
Article Sidebar
Published
Jul 31, 2021
Issue
Section
Articles
How to Cite
ThuanM. D., ThanhN. T., & DungN. Q. (2021). The results of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Tạp Chí Y Dược lâm sàng 108, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.52389/ydls.v16i5.815