Clinical characteristics and result of micro-marsupialization technique for mucocele and ranula
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate clinical characteristics and results of micro-marsupialization technique for mucocele and ranula. Subject and method: A study of 30 mucocele or ranula patients who were treated from August 2019 to March 2020 at Hanoi Medical University Hosptial. Result: Most patients was female (63%); range 10 - 30 was 57.1. There was no risk factor accounted for 60%. 70% of patients had asymptomatic swelling, 86.67% of patients had discomfort when eating. The median size of mucocele was 10.47 ± 2.01mm (range: 7 - 15mm). The median size of ranula was 23 ± 5.07mm (range: 18 - 35mm). The median procedure time was 4.6 ± 1.2 minutes. The 1 week-outcome: 0% infected patient; 40% patients with mild pain and 53.33% patients with no pain. The rate of mild swelling was 86.67%. The 1 month-outcome: Most of patients had no swelling accounting for 80%; 63.33% patients presented full regression 1 month after treatment. The 3 months-outcome: 86.67% patients had full regression; 83.33% patients had normally function of eating. Conlusion: Mucocele and ranula of the oral cavity are common, unknown etiology, and both treated with micro-marsupialization with good outcome, safety, and simple technique.
Article Details
References
2. Huang IY, Chen CM, Kao YH, Worthington P (2007) Treatment of mucocele of the lower lip with carbon dioxide laser. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65(5): 855-858.
3. Delbem AC, Cunha RF, Vieira AE, Ribeiro LL (2000) Treatment of mucus retention phenomena in children by the micro-marsupialization technique: case reports. Pediatr Dent 22(2): 155-158.
4. Abstract - Europe PMC (2020) Simple sublingual ranulas: pathogenesis and management. Accessed https://europepmc.org/ article/med/8551539.
5. Sandrini FAL, Sant’ana-Filho M, Rados PV (2007) Ranula management: Suggested modifications in the micro-marsupialization technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 65(7): 1436-1438.
6. Amaral M, Freitas JB, Mesquita R (2012) Upgrading of the micro-marsupialisation technique for the management of mucus extravasation or retention phenomena. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41.
7. Patel MR, Deal AM, Shockley WW (2009) Oral and plunging ranulas: What is the most effective treatment? the Laryngoscope 119(8): 1501-1509.
8. Jani DR, Chawda J, Sundaragiri SK, Parmar G (2010) Mucocele - A study of 36 cases. Indian J Dent Res 21(3): 337.
9. Chaudhry AP, Reynolds DH, Lachapelle CF, Vickers RA (1960) A clinical and experimental study of mucocele (retention cyst). J Dent Res 39(6): 1253-1262.
10. Mustapha IZ, Boucree SA Jr (2004) Mucocele of the upper lip: Case report of an uncommon presentation and its differential diagnosis. J Can Dent Assoc 70(5): 318-321.
11. Bansal S, Verma DK, Goyal S, Rai M (2017) Comparison of micromarsupialization and modified micromarsupialization for the management of mucocoele of lower lip: A prospective randomized clinical trial. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 16(4): 491-496.
12. Flaitz CM, Hicks MJ, Butler DF et al (2016) Ranulas and mucocoeles. Medscape Last updated.