Clinical characteristics, X-rays and result of using mandibulo-maxillary fixation screws as conservative treatment for mandibular condyle fractures

  • Le Thi Thu Hai 108 Military Central Hospital
  • Nguyen Đinh Thanh Vinh Phuc Hospital
  • Nguyen Thi Hong Minh Central Odonto Stomatology Hospital

Main Article Content

Keywords

Mandibular condyle fractures, screws, conservative treatment

Abstract

Objective: To study clinical characteristics, X-ray characteristics and results of using mandibulo-maxillary fixation screws as conservative treatment for mandibular condyle fractures. Subject and method: A descriptive study of 32 mandibular condyle fractures in 32 patients who were treated from June 2019 to October 2020 at Vinh Phuc Province Hospital. Result: Male/female ratio was 4.3/1, mean age was 31 ± 14.5 years; the range 18 - 40 was 71.88%. Most of patients was due to motorbike accidents, accounting for 84.38%. Chin (78.13%) was the most location impacted force. The most common fracture position was head mandibular condyle (48.78%), the second was neck mandibular condyle (41.46%). The severe fracture deviation was 14.63%; mild fracture deviation was 68.29%, and no deviation was 17.07%. 90.6% patients were used 4 screws. Treatment results after 1 month: 93.75% had correct malocclusion; 78.13% patients were difficult to open mouth; 87.5% patients were able to eat soft food; non-jaw deviation rate when maximally opening mouth was 46.88%; the middle line deviation was 53.12%. Treatment results after 3 months: 87.5% patients were easier when open the mouth; 71.88% patients were able to eat dry food; 84.38% patients had no-jaw deviation when maximally opening. Conclusion: Mandibular condyle fracture due to trauma is more common in men with the indirectly force through the chin. The rate of head and neck mandibular condyle fracture was equivalent. Most of patient had mild deviation. Conservative treatment with mandibulo-maxillary fixation screws is a safe, effective, and simple technique in Odonto-Stomatology Department.


Keywords: Mandibular condyle fractures, screws, conservative treatment.

Article Details

References

1. Trần Văn Trường, Trương Mạnh Dũng (1999) Tình hình chấn thương hàm mặt tại viện Răng hàm mặt Hà Nội trong 11 năm từ (1988-1998) trên 2149 trường hợp. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, Số 10/11/1999, tr. 71-74.
2. Ellis E 3rd, Throckmorton GS (2001) Bite forces after open or closed treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59(4): 389-395.
3. Hồ Nguyễn Thanh Chơn (2004) Điều trị bảo tồn gãy lồi cầu xương hàm dưới. Luận văn tốt nghiệp bác sĩ nội trú Bệnh viện Trường Đại học Y Dược TP. Hồ Chí Minh.
4. Nicohlas Z, Michaei M, Constintine M, Demetrius P, Athena S (2002) Fractures of the mandibular condyle: A review of 466 cases. Literature review, reflections on treatment and proposal: 421-431.
5. Van den Bergh B, JJ de Mol van Otterloo, van der Ploeg T et al (2015) IMF-screws or arch bars as conservative treatment for mandibular condyle fractures: Quality of life aspects. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery: 1-6.
6. Trịnh Hồng Hà (2009) Nhận xét lâm sàng, hình ảnh Xquang và đánh giá kết quả điều trị bảo tồn gãy lồi cầu xương hàm dưới. Luận văn bác sĩ chuyên khoa cấp II, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội.
7. Phan Thị Thuý Ngân (2013) Đánh giá kết quả và một số yếu tố có liên quan đến điều trị bảo tồn gãy lồi cầu xương hàm dưới. Luận văn bác sĩ chuyên khoa cấp II, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội.
8. Nguyễn Thị Yến (2018) Đặc điểm lâm sàng, X-quang và kết quả điều trị gãy dưới lồi cầu xương hàm dưới tại Bệnh viện Răng hàm mặt Trung ương Hà Nội từ 8/2017 đến 10/2018. Luận văn bác sĩ chuyên khoa cấp II, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội.