The early outcome after aortic valves replacement at 108 Military Central Hospital

  • Ngo Tuan Anh 108 Military Central Hospital
  • Nguyen Truong Giang Vietnam Military Medical University

Main Article Content

Keywords

Aortic stenosis, aortic valve replacement

Abstract

Summary


Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate some early outcomes of aortic valve replacement surgery in patients with aortic stenosis at 108 Military Central Hospital. Subject and method: 69 patients with aortic stenosis were replaced with aortic valve from May 2010 to May 2020, with mean age 63.3 ± 10.4 years in male and 67.2 ± 8.5 years in female. Clinical intervention study, collecting indicators (in 30 days after surgery) including: NYHA, electrocardiogram (heart rate, Sokolow Lyon), echocardiography (EF, Dd, Ds, Mean gradient, LVMI, effective orifice area, artificial valve operation), early complications (hemorrhage). Result: NYHA II-III moved to NYHA I-II was 92.8% (p<0.05). The average Sokolow Lyon index was 31.1 ± 2.9 (p<0.05). Mean gradient was decreased and effective orifice area increased, Dd and LVMI decreased significantly (p<0.05). Mean gradient < 20mmHg accounted for 91.3%. Complications of early hemorrhage accounted for 2.9%. Conclusion: Early results of aortic valve replacement significantly improved symptoms, heart morphology and few complications soon after surgery.


              Keywords: Aortic stenosis, aortic valve replacement.

Article Details

References

1. Kirklin JW, Barratt - Boyes BG (1993) Cardiac surgery. 3th, Churchill Livingstone.
2. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J et al (2017) Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging 18: 254-275.
3. Nishimura RA, Otto RM, Bonow RO et al (2017) AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guideline. Circulation 135: 1159-1195.
4. Hahn RT et al (2013) Comparison of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis: A longitudinal study of echocardiography parameters in cohort a of the PARTNER trial (Placement of aortic transcatheter valves). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 61(25): 2514–2521.
5. Nguyễn Hải Âu (2019) Đánh giá kết quả điều trị phẫu thuật trên bệnh nhân hẹp van động mạch chủ tại Khoa Phẫu thuật tim, Bệnh viện Chợ Rẫy, thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.
6. Durand E, Eltchaninoff H, Canville A et al (2015) Feasibility and safety of early discharge after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Edwards SAPIEN-XT prosthesis. The American journal of cardiology 115(8): 1116-1122.
7. Lomivorotov VV, Efremov SM, Kirov MY et al (2017) Low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 31: 291-308.
8. Gaudino M (2005) Survival after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: Does left ventricular mass regression have a clinical correlate?. Eur. Heart J 26(1): 51-57.