Evaluating the improvement of blood gas during general anesthesia applied alveolar recruitment in abdominal surgery elderly

  • Lai Van Hoan Huu Nghi Hospital
  • Cong Quyet Thang Huu Nghi Hospital
  • Le Thi Viet Hoa 108 Military Central Hospital

Main Article Content

Keywords

Alveolar recruitment, abdominal surgery, blood gas

Abstract

Summary


Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of alveolar recruitment method on improvement of arterial oxygenation during general anesthesia. Subject and            method: A randomized controlled clinical trial was divided into 2 groups of "intervention group" 45 patients and "control group" 37 patients. Method of mobilizing alveoli with a pressure of 40cmH2O for 40 seconds and maintaining a PEEP of 5cmH2O. Result: Mean of age of interventional group and control group were respectively 74.8 ± 8.4 and 76.4 ± 9.5. Mean of PaO2 at T2 (at a time after 5 minutes of final alveolar mobilization and completion of mechanical ventilation in both groups) in intervention group was 151.33 ± 25.94mmHg compare to 132.53 ± 36.08mmHg in control group. Mean of PaCO2 at T2 in interventional group and control group were respectively 39.12 ± 7.20mmHg and 38.21 ± 5.76mmHg; (p>0.05). The rate PaO2/FiO2 at T2 was 359.06 ± 62.84 vs 310.22 ± 71.74 in control group. And this great difference was significant with p=0.0012. Conclusion: “Alveolar Recruitment” improves effectly the arterial oxygenation during general anesthesia such as PaO2, PaCO2 and PaO2/FiO2, as well as there were no complications of resparitory and hemodynamic.


Keywords: Alveolar recruitment, abdominal surgery, blood gas.


 

Article Details

References

1. Almarakbi WA, Fawzi HM, Alhashemi JA (2009) Effects of four intraoperative ventilatory strategies on respiratory compliance and gas exchange during laparoscopic gastric banding in obese patients. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia 102(6): 862-868.
2. Anis S, Amr E, Fouad G (2011) The effect of alveolar recruitment maneuvres on arterial oxygenation and lung compliance during general anesthesia. Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology 4(1): 37-48.
3. Arozullah AM, Daley J, Henderson WG et al (2000) Multifactorial risk index for predicting postoperative respiratory failure in men after major noncardiac surgery. The national veterans administration surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg 232(2): 242-53.
4. Duggan M, Kavanagh BP (2005) Pulmonary atelectasisa pathogenic perioperative entity. Anesthesiology: The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists 102(4): 838-854.
5. Lovas A, Szakmány T (2015) Haemodynamic effects of lung recruitment manoeuvres. BioMed Research International.
6. Souza AP de, Buschpigel M, Mathias LA, Silva T et al (2009) Analysis of the effects of the alveolar recruitment maneuver on blood oxygenation during bariatric surgery. Revista brasileira de anestesiologia 59(2): 177-186.
7. Sprung J, Weingarten Toby N, Warner David O (2010) Ventilatory strategies during anesthesia. Morbid Obesity: Peri-operative Management, Cambridge University Press.
8. Sprung J, Whalen Francis X, Comfere Thomas et al (2009) Alveolar recruitment and arterial desflurane concentration during bariatric surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia 108(1): 120-127.
9. Weingarten TN, Whalen FX, Warner DO et al (2009) Comparison of two ventilatory strategies in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. British journal of anaesthesia 104(1): 16-22.
10. Grasso S, Mascia L, Del Turco M et al (2002) Effects of recruiting maneuvers in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome ventilated with protective ventilatory strategy. Anesthesiology: The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists 96(4): 795-802.