The assessment of clinical outcomes of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocarditis

  • Bui Van Cuong Bach Mai Hospital
  • Le Thi Viet Hoa 108 Institute Of Clinical Medical And Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • Dao Xuan Co Bach Mai Hospital

Main Article Content

Keywords

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, acute myocarditis, cardiogenic shock

Abstract

Summary


Objective: To assess the effectiveness of clinical outcomes in cardiogenic shock due to acute myocarditis in adult patients supported veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Subject and method: Prospective study in acute myocarditis patients complicated cardiogenic shock were supported VA ECMO in ICU, Bach Mai Hospital from 2014 to 2018. Mean blood pressure, blood pressurre, pulse pressure, lactat and SOFA were recorded before and after VA ECMO. Result: Forty five patients with average age 35.6 (min: 18, max: 67), female was 66.7%, the survival rate was 81.4%. The comparion between before initiating VA ECMO and ending ECMO, heart rate decreased from 116.9 ± 43.02 to 94.4 ± 29.02 beats per minute, mean blood pressure, and blood pressure increased from 62.4 ± 24.60mmHg, 33.7 ± 14.85mmHg to 77.6 ± 17.70mmHg, 39.5 ± 16.71mmHg respectively. Blood lactate concentation reduced from 7.6 ± 4.47mmol/l to 2.5 ± 3.38mmol/l and SOFA score increased significantly from 7.8 ± 2.68 to 9.6 ± 3.68 (p<0.05). Conclusion: The recovery of shock situation improved after VA ECMO. Decreased heart pulse and serum lactate, mean blood pressure and blood pressure improved, however SOFA score increased significantly during ECMO.


Keywords: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, acute myocarditis, cardiogenic shock.


 

Article Details

References

1. Caforio ALP, Pankuweit S, Arbustini E et al (2013) Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: A position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J 34(33): 2636-2648, 2648–2648.
2. Hollenberg SM, Kavinsky CJ, Parrillo JE (1999) Cardiogenic shock. Ann Intern Med 131(1): 47-59.
3. Hofer A, Leitner S, Kreuzer M et al (2017) Differential diagnosis of alterations in arterial flow and tissue oxygenation on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Int J Artif Organs 40(11): 651–655.
4. Lorusso R, Centofanti P et al (2016) Venoarterial Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute fulminant myocarditis in adult patients: A 5-Year multi-institutional experience. Ann Thorac Surg 101(3): 919-926.
5. Mirabel M, Luyt CE, Leprince P et al (2011) Outcomes, long-term quality of life, and psychologic assessment of fulminant myocarditis patients rescued by mechanical circulatory support. Crit Care Med 39(5): 1029-1035.
6. Montero S, Aissaoui N, Tadié JM et al (2018) Fulminant giant-cell myocarditis on mechanical circulatory support: Management and outcomes of a French multicentre cohort. Int J Cardiol 253: 105-112.
7. Veronese G, Ammirati E, Cipriani M et al (2018) Fulminant myocarditis: Characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Anatol J Cardiol 19(4): 279-286.