Reconstruction of thumb amputation without thenar muscles by trimmed great toe transfer

  • Tan Nguyen Viet 108 Military Central Hospital
  • Doan Le Van 108 Military Central Hospital
  • Hung Ngo Thai 108 Military Central Hospital
  • Nam Nguyen Viet 108 Military Central Hospital
  • Ngoc Nguyen Viet 108 Military Central Hospital

Main Article Content

Keywords

Toe to thumb transfer, trimmed great toe transfer

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the results of reconstruction of the thumb amputation without thenar muscles by trimmed great toe transfer and the donor site morbidity following the surgery. Subject and method: Prospective study. From December, 2011 to November, 2018, 13 trimmed great toe flaps were transferred to reconstruct thumb stump without thenar muscles in 13 patients (11 males and 2 females) with the average of following-up time was 3 years 5 months (range: 12 months to 78 months). Result: 13/13 flaps survived. 1 case had infection complication of the flexor tendon repair.  Secondary outcomes: 2 out of 13 patients did not achieve the basic thumb opposition due to the misposition of the new thumb and required corrective osteotomies in the future. 11 out of 13 patients archived the basic thumb opposition. Of these 11 patients; 8 archived the grip strength > 50% compared to the uninjured side, 8 archived the pinch strength > 30% uninjured side, Kapandji thumb opposition score ranged from 4 to 9; The average score of Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire and the Quick disability of arm, shoulder and hand was 74.7 and 17.1/100 respectively. The average of static 2- point discrimination was 14mm. 2 out of 13 reconstructed thumbs had hyperextension deformity at the metacarpophalangeal joint. In the donor foot: The surgery caused unbalance. However, when wearing shoes or sandals, the patients still did the life activities like stand, walk, take the stairs, jump and run almost normally. 2 out of 13 patients had the new callus at the palmar side around the distal second and third metatarsal area. 4 out of 13 patients suffered medial deviation of the second toe. The average score of foot and ankle disability index was 91.6/100. Conclusion: Trimmed great toe transfer for reconstruction of thumb stumps withour thenar muscles was safe and had good function outcomes. The donor site morbidity did not influence too much to the normal life activities.


 

Article Details

References

1. Ki SH (2019) Non-microsurgical reconstruction. In Woo S.H. (Ed). The thumb - A guide to surgical management. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd: Singapore: 321-330.
2. Sabapathy SR, Venkatramani H, Bhardwaj P (2013) Reconstruction of the thumb amputation at the carpometacarpal joint level by groin flap and second toe transfer. Injury 44(3): 370-375.
3. Lin CH, Mardini S, Lin YT, Lin Cheng H, Chen CT, Wei FC (2008) Osteoplastic thumb ray restoration with or withourt secondary toe transfer for reconstruction of opposable basic hand function. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(4): 1288-1297.
4. Adani R, Woo SH (2017) Microsurgical thumb repair and reconstruction. J Hand Surg Eur 42(8): 771-788.
5. Roger de Oña I, Garcia Villanueva A, Studer de Oya A (2018) An alternative thumb reconstruction by double microsurgical transfer from the great and second toe for a carpometacarpal amputation. J Hand Surg Am 43(10): 955.e1-955.e9.
6. Tsai TM, D'Agostino L, Fang YS, Tien H (2009) Compound flap from the great toe and vascularized joints from the second toe for posttraumatic thumb reconstruction at the level of the proximal metacarpal bone. Microsurgery 29(3): 178-183.
7. Wei FC, Chen HC, Chuang CC, Noordhoff MS (1988) Reconstruction of the thumb with a trimmed-toe transfer technique. Plat Reconstr Surg 82(3):506-15.
8. Kapandji A (1986) Clinical test of apposition and counter-apposition of the thumb. Ann Chir Main 5(1): 67-73.
9. Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA (1998) Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surgery 23(4): 575-587.
10. Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN (2005) Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the quickDASH: Comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(5): 1038-1046.
11. Rosen B, Lundborg G (2000) A model instrument for the documentation of outcome after nerve repair. J Hand Surg Am 25(3): 535-543.
12. Beyaert C, Henry S, Dautel G, Martinet N, Beltramo F, Lascombes P, Andre JM (2003) Effect on balance and gait secondary to removal of the second toe for digital reconstruction: 5 year follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop 23(1): 60-64.
13. Martin RL, Burdett RG, Irrgang JJ (1999) Development of the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 29: 32-33.
14. Michon J, Merle M, Bouchon Y, Foucher G (1985) Thumb reconstruction pollicisation or toe-to-hand transfers. Acomparative study of functional results. Ann Chir Main 4(2): 98-110.
15. Tan JSW, Tu YD (2013) Comparative study of outcomes between pollicization and microsurgery second toe-metatarsal bone transfer for congenital radial deficiency with hypoplastic thumb. J Reconstr Microsurg 29(9): 587-592.
16. Del Piñal F, Garcia-Bernal FJ, Delgado J, Regalado J, Sanmartin M, Garcia-Fernan-dez D (2005) Overcoming soft-tissue deficiency in toe-to-hand transfer using a dorsalis pedis fasciocutaneous toe free flap: Surgical technique. J Han Surg 30(1): 111-119.
17. Wei FC, Chen HC, Chuang CC, Chen SHT (1994) Microsurgical thumb reconstruction with toe transfer: Selection of various techniques. Plast reconstr surg 93(2): 345-351.
18. Woo SH (2019) Microsurgical reconstruction. In Woo SH (Ed). The Thumb - A guide to surgical management. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd: Singapore: 331-366.
19. Buncke GM, Buncke HJ, Lee CL (2007) Great toe – to - thumb microvascular transplantation after traumatic amputation. Hand Clin 23(1): 105-115.