Evaluating pathological features according to hormone receptor-negative breast cancer molecular subtypes

  • Nguyễn Văn Chủ

Main Article Content

Keywords

Breast cancer, negative hormone receptor, molecular subtypes

Abstract

Summary


Objective: To determine some relations between pathological features and negative hormone receptor breast cancer molecular subtypes. Subject and method: 202 hormone receptor-negative breast cancer patients underwent immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for molecular categories and evaluating the relationship with pathological features. Result: Triple negative non basal-like (TNB-), triple negative basal-like (TNB+) and HER2 types accounted for highest rates in high Ki67 (55.6%, 55.3%, and 51.5%; respectively), with highest rate in p53(+)Bcl2(-), were more common in patients with more than 3 positive nodes (27.8%, 22.4% and 22.3%, respectively), as well as in poor Nottingham prognostic index (NPI) subtype (p<0.001). Conclusion: The hormone receptor-negative breast cancer molecular subtypes are often associated with poor pathological features.


Keywords: Breast cancer, negative hormone receptor, molecular subtypes.

Article Details

References

1. Adly S, Hewedi IH, Mokhtar NM (2010) Clinicopathologic significance of molecular classification of breast cancer: Relation to Nottingham prognosis index. Journal of the Egyptian Nat. Cancer Inst 22(4).
2. Bhargava R, Beriwal S, Dabb DJ et al (2010) Immunohistochemical surrogate markers of breast cancer molecular classes predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A single Institutional experience with 359 cases. Cancer, in press.
3. Bhargava R, Esposito NN and Dabbs DJ (2010) Immunohistology of the Breast. Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry: Theranostic and genomic applications. Saunders, USA: 763-819.
4. Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA et al (2006) Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the carolina breast cancer study. JAMA 295(21): 2492–2502.
5. Cheang MC, Voduc D, Bajdik C et al (2008) Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value than triple-negative phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 14: 1368-1376.
6. Krajewski S, Thor AD, Edgerton SM et al (1997). Breast cancers. Analysis of Bax and Bcl-2 expression in p53-immunopositive. Clin Cancer Res 3: 199-208.
7. Lakhani SR, Elis IO, Schnitt SJ et al (2012) WHO classification of tumors of the breast. IARC, Lyon, France.
8. Perou CM, Sørlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406(6797): 747-752.
9. Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J et al (2003) Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14): 8418-8423.
10. Spitale A, Mazzola P, Soldini D et al (2009) Breast cancer classification according to immunohistochemical markers: Clinicopathologic features and short-term survival analysis in a population-based study from the South of Switzerland. Annals of Oncology 20: 628-635.