Comparing the growth of children born from in vitro fertilization with children born from natural pregnancy

  • Ngô Minh Xuân
  • Lê Thị Minh Châu

Main Article Content

Keywords

Physical health, mental health, in vitro fertilization, weight of children, height of children

Abstract

Summary


Objective: To compare the physical and mental development between children born from in vitro fertilization and children born from natural pregnancy. Subject and method: 429 children born by in vitro fertilization and 509 natural babies born 5-30 months old were examined in 2015 - 2018 at Tu Du Hospital, regardless of gender, in Ho Chi Minh City. Result and conclusion: The weight between newborns from in vitro fertilization (9.7 ± 2.3kg) and children born naturally (9.5 ± 1.9kg) with p>0.05. Height between newborns from in vitro fertilization (74.8 ± 7.7cm) and natural babies (75.0 ± 6.9cm) with p>0.05. Only the 8-month-old group of babies born from in vitro fertilization had a higher rate of overweight-obesity than children born naturally. Only the motor posture index had a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the children born from in vitro fertilization (106.51 ± 9.9) and those born naturally (105.03 ± 9,6). Other indexes and general index had not significant difference. There was a statistically significant difference in language development index: The in vitro fertilization group had a lower proportion than that group of children born naturally. This difference in language index only occurs in the age group of 8 - 12 months old.


Keywords: Physical health, mental health, in vitro fertilization, weight of children, height of children.

Article Details

References

1. Nobel Prize (2010) The nobel prize in physiology or medicine 2010 to robert G. Edwards for the development of in vitro fertilization. The Nobelprize. https://www. nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/2010/press.html, 25/3/2017.
2. Squires J, Kaplan P (2007) Developmental outcomes of children born after assisted reproductive technologies. Infants & Young Children 20(1): 2-10.
3. Charkaluk ML, Truffert P, Marchand-Martin L et al (2011) Very preterm children free of disability or delay at age 2: Predictors of schooling at age 8: A population-based longitudinal study. Early Human Development 87(4): 297-302.
4. Belva F, Henriet S, Liebaers I et al (2007) Medical outcome of 8-year-old singleton ICSI children (born ≥ 32 weeks’ gestation) and a spontaneously conceived comparison group. Human Reproduction, 22(2): 506-515.
5. Meddeb L, Pauly V, Boyer P et al (2017) Longitudinal growth of French singleton children born after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Body mass index up to 5 years of age. Revue d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique 65(3): 197-208.
6. Cardoso FGC, Formiga CKMR, Bizinotto T et al (2017) Concurrent validity of the Brunet -Lézine scale with the bayley sale for assessment of the development of preterm infants up to two years. Revista Paulista de Pediatria 35(2): 144-150.