The correlation between clinical characteristics and H reflex in sciatica patients due to lumbar disc herniation

  • Trương Đình Cẩm
  • Hoàng Tiến Trọng Nghĩa

Main Article Content

Keywords

H reflex, sciatica, lumbar disc herniation

Abstract

Summary


              Objective: To investigate the correlation between clinical characteristics, herniated types and H reflex in sciatica patients. Subject and method: A cross-sectional study at the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, 175 Military Hospital from December 2018 to May 2019. Result: 63% of the studied population had H reflex abnormality; the percentage of abnormality in one-sided pain group was 65.5% and in bilateral pain group was 58.8%. Differences in latency, amplitude and H/M ratio of H reflex when comparing two legs in both bilateral and one-sided pain were not statistically significant. The correlation between H reflex and clinical characteristics was higher and statistically significant in the bilateral pain group. The correlation between H reflex with abnormal sensory was low (0.232) but higher with ankle reflex (0.491) and Lasègue sign (0.537) (p<0.05). The correlation between H reflex and two clinical characteristics was tighter with correlation coefficient ranging from 0.528 to 0.648 (p<0.05). The correlation between H reflex and abnormalities of all three clinical characteristics including sensation, ankle reflex and Lasègue sign was the most correlated with 0.653 (p<0.05). Conclusion: H reflex abnormalities were seen nearly two-thirds of patients in this study. The correlation between H-reflex abnormalities with at least two of three clinical characteristics including Lasègue sign, ankle reflex and sensation was higher with regard to each factor. 


Keywords: H reflex, sciatica, lumbar disc herniation. 

Article Details

References

1. Nguyễn Hữu Công (2013) Chẩn đoán điện và ứng dụng lâm sàng. Nhà xuất bản Đại học Quốc gia Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, tr. 125.
2. El Barzouhi A, Verwoerd AJ, Peul WC et al (2016) Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with sciatica. J Neurosurg Spine 24(6): 978-985.
3. Grovle L, Haugen AJ, Keller A et al (2013) Prognostic factors for return to work in patients with sciatica. Spine J 13(15): 1849-1857.
4. Iversen T, Solberg TK, Romner B et al (2013) Accuracy of physical examination for chronic lumbar radiculopathy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14: 206.
5. Koes BW, Tulder MW, Peul WC (2007) Diagnosis and treatment of sciatica. Bmj 334(7607): 1313-1317.
6. Konstantinou K, Dunn KM, Ogollah R et al (2015) Characteristics of patients with low back and leg pain seeking treatment in primary care: Baseline results from the ATLAS cohort study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 16: 332.
7. Stynes S, Konstantinou K, Ogollah R et al (2018) Clinical diagnostic model for sciatica developed in primary care patients with low back-related leg pain. PLoS One 13(4): 0191852.
8. Tsai IH, Tsai HH (2013) Unilateral reference Values for hoffmannis reflex in patients with suspected lumbosacral radiculopathies. Open Journal of Orthopedics 03(03): 5.
9. Tsao BE, Levin KH, Bodner RA (2003) Comparison of surgical and electrodiagnostic findings in single root lumbosacral radiculopathies. Muscle Nerve 27(1): 60-64.
10. Verwoerd AJ, Peul WC, Willemsen SP et al (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of history taking to assess lumbosacral nerve root compression. Spine J 14(15): 2028-2037.