A case of prostate cancer detected after six biopsies

  • Nguyễn Hoàng Đức Bệnh viện Tâm Anh TP. Hồ Chí Minh
  • Phạm Thanh Trúc Bệnh viện Tâm Anh TP. Hồ Chí Minh
  • Châu Minh Duy Bệnh viện Tâm Anh TP. Hồ Chí Minh

Main Article Content

Keywords

Prostate cancer, PSA, MRI-targeted biopsy, Gleason score, ductal adenocarcinoma, grade shift.

Abstract

Objective: To report a challenging case of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosed after multiple negative systematic biopsies and its clinical implications. Case report: A male patient had been followed since 2015 with rising Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) levels while using a 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor (5-ARI). Despite persistent suspicious findings on multi-parametric MRI (PI-RADS 4), five consecutive systematic biopsies yielded negative results. In December 2025, the sixth biopsy eventually identified acinar adenocarcinoma with a Gleason score of 3+3 (Grade Group 1). The patient subsequently underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in March 2026. Result: The final histopathological report from the surgical specimen revealed a significant grade shift to Gleason score 4+4 (Grade Group 4), featuring a combination of acinar and ductal adenocarcinoma. The tumor involved 35% of the prostate volume, was confined to the gland (pT2), and showed perineural invasion. Conclusion: This case highlights the critical need to adjust PSA interpretation during 5-ARI therapy and the clinical superiority of MRI-targeted biopsy over systematic sampling for PI-RADS ≥ 4 lesions. Furthermore, clinicians must remain vigilant regarding potential grade migration and aggressive histological variants like ductal adenocarcinoma, which may be underestimated in initial biopsies.

Article Details

References

1. Santiago I, Rivas JG (2026) Re: EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 89(1): 100-102. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.07.023
2. Habib FK, Ross M, Tate R, Chisholm GD (1997) Differential effect of finasteride on the tissue androgen concentrations in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 46(2): 137-144. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2265.1997.950908.x
3. Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M et al (2018) MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 378(19): 1767-1777. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1801993
4. Iczkowski KA, van Leenders GJLH, van der Kwast TH (2021) The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 45(7): 1007. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001678
5. Goel S, Shoag JE, Gross MD et al (2020) Concordance Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Pathology in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 3(1): 10-20. doi:10.1016/j.euo.2019.08.001
6. Marra G, van Leenders GJLH, Zattoni F et al (2023) Impact of Epithelial Histological Types, Subtypes, and Growth Patterns on Oncological Outcomes for Patients with Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Treated with Curative Intent: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol 84(1): 65-85. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.014