Characteristics of left ventricular longitudinal stress index on ultrasound mechanical tissue markers in patients with chronic heart failure at Viet Tiep Friendship Hospital
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) and its correlation with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF% - Biplane) in patients with chronic heart failure. Subject and method: This was a prospective, descriptive study conducted on 88 patients diagnosed with chronic heart failure who were hospitalized at the Department of Cardiology, Viet Tiep Friendship Hospital, from January 2024 to September 2024. All patients were followed for cardiovascular events over a 5-month period after their first admission. Clinical history, physical examination, biochemical testing, and echocardiographic assessment were performed, including measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF%) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) following standardized protocols. The rates of rehospitalization and cardiovascular events were recorded. Result: The mean GLS was -13.25 ± 6.17. In subgroup analysis: reduced EF% group, -8.59 ± 3.36; mildly reduced EF% group, -11.50 ± 2.31; preserved EF% group, -19.63 ± 3.73. According to NYHA classification: NYHA II, -19.63 ± 3.73; NYHA III, -9.71 ± 3.24; NYHA IV, -6.03 ± 2.39. A strong negative linear correlation was observed between GLS and LVEF (r = -0.88; p < 0.01). Statistically significant differences in GLS were found between patients with and without hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease (-11.94 ± 5.14 vs. -15.05 ± 7.04; p = 0.02; -11.42 ± 5.83 vs. -14.34 ± 6.16; p = 0.03; -11.25 ± 5.49 vs. -15.88 ± 6.10; p = 0.01, respectively). The average length of hospital stay was longer in the low GLS group (5.11 ± 0.65 days) compared with the high GLS group (3.23 ± 0.60 days, p = 0.03). Conclusion: The mean left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with chronic heart failure was reduced and showed a strong inverse correlation with left ventricular ejection fraction. Lower GLS values were observed in patients with reduced EF%, higher NYHA functional class, and those with comorbid hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, or chronic kidney disease. Patients with lower GLS had longer hospital stays compared to those with normal GLS.
Article Details
References
2. Feng J, Zhang Y, and Zhang J (2024) Epidemiology and Burden of Heart Failure in Asia. JACC Asia 4(4): 249-264.
3. Pio SM et al (2023) Changes in Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain in Patients With Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: The COAPT Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 12(17): 029956.
4. Man DE et al (2025) Left atrial strain in patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A narrative review. Life (Basel) 15(2).
5. Christos G Mihos, et al (2025) Speckle-Tracking Strain Echocardiography for the Assessment of Left Ventricular Structure and Function: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 152(10): 96-109.
6. Beghini A et al (2025) 2024 update in heart failure. ESC Heart Fail 12(1): 8-42.
7. Yingchoncharoen T et al (2013) Normal ranges of left ventricular strain: a meta-analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 26(2): 185-191.
8. Nguyễn Duy Toàn, Đỗ Thị Hải Linh, and Nguyễn Thanh Xuân (2022) Nghiên cứu chỉ số sức căng dọc thất trái bằng siêu âm đánh dấu mô cơ tim ở bệnh nhân suy tim mạn tính. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam 520(1B): 242-245.
9. Marschall A et al (2025) Global Longitudinal Strain versus Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction for the Prediction of Short-term Clinical Progression in Asymptomatic Stable Heart Failure Patients. J Cardiovasc Echogr. 35(1): 32-36.
10. Nguyễn Thị Kiều Ly và cộng sự (2021) Đánh giá một số thông số về sức căng và vận động xoắn của thất trái bằng siêu âm tim đánh dấu mô 3D ở bệnh nhân suy tim mạn tính.
11. Thi Nguyen, Vu Nguyen, and Van Vo (2025), Research of left ventricular global longitudinal strain using speckle- tracking echocardiography in patients with chronic heart failure. Tạp chí Y Dược Huế. 15: 124-129.
12. Đỗ Văn Chiến, Trần Quốc Quý, and Lê Văn Tờ (2023) Đánh giá chỉ số sức căng thất trái bằng siêu âm tim đánh dấu mô ở bệnh nhân suy tim có tổn thương thận. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam 532(1): 227-231.
13. Thomas H Marwick, Sanjiv J Shah, and James D %J JAMA cardiology Thomas (2019) Myocardial strain in the assessment of patients with heart failure: a review. 4(3): 287-294.
14. Stephan M Pio et al (2023) Changes in Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain in Patients With Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: The COAPT Trial. Journal of the American Heart Association. 12(17), p. e029956.
15. Rachid Abou et al (2020) Global longitudinal strain: clinical use and prognostic implications in contemporary practice. 106(18): 1438-1444.
16. Elisabeth Kraigher-Krainer et al (2014) Impaired systolic function by strain imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. 63(5): 447-456.
17. Phạm Thị Hằng Hoa, Đỗ Kim Bảng, and Nguyễn Thị Bạch Yến (2019) Khảo sát đặc điểm chỉ số sức căng dọc thất trái (GLS) trên siêu âm 2D đánh dấu mô cơ tim ở bệnh nhân đau thắt ngực ổn định. Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam(86): 50-54.
ISSN: 1859 - 2872