Intravenous thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism: Treatment outcomes at 108 Military Central Hospital
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a severe and life-threatening condition caused by thrombotic obstruction of the pulmonary artery branches, often originating from the veins of the lower limbs or pelvis. It is one of the leading causes of cardiovascular mortality, following myocardial infarction and stroke. Fibrinolytic therapy with rtPA has proven to play a critical role in saving patients' lives. However, at the Heart Institute, 108 Military Central Hospital, there has been no comprehensive evaluation of the treatment outcomes, prompting the need for this study to summarize clinical experiences. Objective: To evaluate treatment outcomes of intravenous thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism at 108 Military Central Hospital. Subject and method: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 22 patients with acute pulmonary embolism due to thrombosis at the 108 Heart Institute from January 2019 to November 2024. Clinical and paraclinical parameters, as well as complications, were assessed before and after fibrinolytic therapy. Result: Patients treated with rtPA (Alteplase), clinical and paraclinical parameters, such as heart rate, blood pressure, SpO₂, and pulmonary artery pressure, showed significant improvement. However, bleeding complications were observed in some patients with risk factors, including recent surgery or late-stage malignancy. Conclusion: Fibrinolytic therapy with rtPA effectively improves clinical and paraclinical outcomes in patients with high-risk acute pulmonary embolism. Nevertheless, caution is required due to the risk of bleeding complications.
Article Details
References
2. ISTH Steering Committee for World Thrombosis Day (2014) Thrombosis: a major contributor to the global disease burden. J Thromb Haemost 12(10): 1580-1590.
3. Meyer G, Vicaut E, Danays T et al (2014) Fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 370(15): 1402-1411.
4. Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Heusel G et al (2002) Heparin plus alteplase compared with heparin alone in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 347(15): 1143-1150.
5. Tạ Mạnh Cường, Nguyễn Thị Thu Hương (2021) Bước đầu đánh giá hiệu quả điều trị thuốc tiêu sợi huyết trong tắc động mạch phổi cấp và kẹt van cơ học. Tạp Chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam 97, tr. 61-68.
6. Furfaro D, Stephens RS, Streiff MB, Brower R (2018) Catheter-directed Thrombolysis for Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism. Ann Am Thorac Soc 15(2): 134-144.
7. Sadeghipour P, Jenab Y, Moosavi J et al (2022) Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis vs Anticoagulation in Patients With Acute Intermediate-High-risk Pulmonary Embolism: The CANARY Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol 7(12): 1189-1197.
ISSN: 1859 - 2872