Association between changes in rectus femoris cross-sectional area measured by ultrasound and mechanical ventilation status in patients with septic shock
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the association between changes in rectus femoris cross-sectional area (CSA) and mechanical ventilation status and duration in patients with septic shock. Subject and method: A prospective descriptive study was conducted on 116 patients with septic shock at 108 Military Central Hospital. Rectus femoris CSA was measured by bedside ultrasound at admission (T0), day 4 (T4), and day 7 (T7). Result: Among the 116 patients, 93 (80.2%) required mechanical ventilation. The absolute change in rectus femoris CSA at days 4 and 7 was significantly greater in the ventilated group compared to the non-ventilated group (day 4: -0.24cm² vs. -0.16cm², p<0.01; day 7: -0.38cm² vs. -0.23cm², p<0.01). The percentage reduction in CSA was also significantly higher in the ventilated group (day 4: -9.96% vs. -5.57%, p<0.01; day 7: -14.8% vs. -8.52%, p<0.01). ROC analysis demonstrated that the absolute CSA change at day 7 (ΔCSA7) could distinguish prolonged mechanical ventilation (> 7 days) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.676 (95% CI: 0.560 - 0.792), sensitivity of 75%, and specificity of 62% at the cutoff point of -0.355cm². Conclusion: Changes in rectus femoris CSA are associated with mechanical ventilation status and duration in patients with septic shock.
Article Details
References
2. Akan B (2021) Influence of sarcopenia focused on critically ill patients. Acute Crit Care. 2021;36(1):15-21. doi:10.4266/acc.2020.00745.
3. Lee ZY, Ong SP, Ng CC et al (2021) Association between ultrasound quadriceps muscle status with premorbid functional status and 60-day mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill patient: A single-center prospective observational study. Clin Nutr Edinb Scotl 40(3): 1338-1347. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2020.08.022.
4. Thomaes T, Thomis M, Onkelinx S, Coudyzer W (2012) Cornelissen V, Vanhees L. Reliability and validity of the ultrasound technique to measure the rectus femoris muscle diameter in older CAD-patients. BMC Med Imaging. 12: 7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-12-7.
5. Sanada K, Kearns CF, Midorikawa T, Abe T (2006) Prediction and validation of total and regional skeletal muscle mass by ultrasound in Japanese adults. Eur J Appl Physiol 96(1): 24-31. doi:10.1007/s00421-005-0061-0.
6. Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ et al (2016) Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315(8): 762-774. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
7. Zhang W, Wu J, Gu Q, et al (2021) Changes in muscle ultrasound for the diagnosis of intensive care unit acquired weakness in critically ill patients. Sci Rep 11(1): 18280. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-97680-y.
8. Yao H, Zhang J, Jiang R et al Early predictive value of ultrasound measurements of rectus femoris cross-sectional area to diagnose ICU-acquired weakness in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation: A prospective cohort study. Eur J Med Res 29(1): 379. doi:10.1186/s40001-024-01966-6.
9. Witteveen E, Sommers J, Wieske L, et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative neuromuscular ultrasound for the diagnosis of intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a cross-sectional observational study. Ann Intensive Care 7(1):40. doi:10.1186/s13613-017-0263-8.
10. Fanzani A, Conraads VM, Penna F, Martinet W (2012) Molecular and cellular mechanisms of skeletal muscle atrophy: an update. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 3(3): 163-179. doi:10.1007/s13539-012-0074-6.
11. Peñuelas O, Keough E, López-Rodríguez L, et al (2019) Ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction: translational mechanisms lead to therapeutical alternatives in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med Exp 7(1): 48. doi:10.1186/s40635-019-0259-9.
12. Takahashi Y, Morisawa T, Okamoto H, et al (2023) Diaphragm Dysfunction and ICU-Acquired Weakness in Septic Shock Patients with or without Mechanical Ventilation: A Pilot Prospective Observational Study. J Clin Med 12(16): 5191. doi:10.3390/jcm12165191.
ISSN: 1859 - 2872