Impact of frailty on hospital adverse outcomes in elderly with acute coronary syndrome
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Objective: To describe frailty ratio according to the Canadian Clinical Frail Scale (CFS) and its association with hospital adverse outcomes in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome. Subject and method: Observational study, conducted from February 2021 to September 2022, at Vietnam Heart Institute, Bach Mai Hospital. Patients over 60 years old, diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome, meeting selection criteria were assessed for frailty using CFS scale and monitored for adverse events. Adverse events during hospital stay included: Death, stroke, acquired pneumonia, arrhythmia, and severe bleeding. Net adverse clinical events (NACE) are defined as the composite of death, stroke, and major bleeding. Result: Study included 145 patients, average age was 72.68 ± 6.28 years. The frailty ratio was 36.55%. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (80.0%), diabetes (33.10%), heart failure (15.86%), dyslipidemia (13.10%), and history of stroke (10.34%). Compared with non-frailty patients, frailty group had significantly higher risk of adverse outcomes during hospital stay (OR = 2.32; CI 95%: 1.08-5.01) and higher risk of Net adverse clinical events -NACE (OR = 5.27, CI 95%: 1.28-21.65). Conclusion: Frailty ratio is quite high, accounting for 36.55% of elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome according to the CFS scale. This study demonstrated that frailty is a significant risk factor for hospital adverse outcomes in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes.
Article Details
References
2. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(3): 146-156.
3. Morley JE, Malmstrom TK, Miller DK (2012) A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging 16(7): 601-608.
4. Bebb O, Smith FG, Clegg A, Hall M, Gale CP (2018) Frailty and acute coronary syndrome: A structured literature review. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 7(2): 166-175. doi: 10.1177/2048872617700873. Epub 2017 Mar 20. PMID: 29064267; PMCID: PMC7614831.
5. Alonso Salinas GL, Sanmartin M, Pascual Izco M, et al (2017) Frailty is an independent prognostic marker in elderly patients with myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol 40(10): 925-931.
6. Alonso Salinas GL, Sanmartín Fernández M, Pascual Izco M, Martín Asenjo R, Recio-Mayoral A, Salvador Ramos L, Marzal Martín D, Camino López A, Jiménez Mena M, Zamorano Gómez JL (2016) Frailty is a short-term prognostic marker in acute coronary syndrome of elderly patients. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 5(5): 434-440. doi: 10.1177/2048872616644909. Epub 2016 Apr 18. PMID: 27091834.
7. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C et al (2005) A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ 173: 489-495.
8. Alonso SGL, Sanmartin M, Pascual IM et al (2018) the role of frailty in acute coronary syndromes in the elderly. Gerontology 64(5): 422-429.
9. Zaslavsky O, Cochrane BB, Thompson HJ, Woods NF, Herting JR, LaCroix A (2013) Frailty: A review of the first decade of research. Biol Res Nurs 15(4): 422-32. doi: 10.1177/1099800412462866. Epub 2012 Oct 18. PMID: 23086382.
10. Tse G, Gong M, Nunez J et al (2017) Frailty and mortality outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc 18(12): 1097: 1-10.
11. Graham MM, Galbraith PD, O’Neill D et al (2013) Frailty and out- come in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome. Can J Cardiol 29: 1610-1615.
12. Sanchis J, Ariza-Solé A, Abu-Assi E et al (2019) Invasive versus conservative strategy in frail patients with NSTEMI: The MOSCA-FRAIL clinical trial study design. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 72: 154-159.
13. Alegre O, Formiga F, López-Palop R et al (2018) An easy assessment of frailty at baseline independently predicts prognosis in very elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome. J Am Med Dir Assoc 19: 296-303.