The early results of transthoracic video-assisted esophagectomy with retrosternal gastric tube in the treatment of esophageal cancer

  • Pham Van Hiep 108 Military Central Hospital
  • Nguyen Anh Tuan 108 Military Central Hospital
  • Nguyen Cuong Thinh 108 Military Central Hospital

Main Article Content

Keywords

Video-assisted transthoracic esophagectomy

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the early results of transthoracic video-assisted esophagectomy with retrosternal gastric tube in the treatment of esophageal cancer at 108 Military Central Hospital. Subject and method: A retrospective and prospective study, including 77 patients with esophageal cancer at 1/3 middle and 1/3 lower who underwent transthoracic video-assisted esophagectomy with a retrosternal gastric tube from November 2018 to November 2022. The parameters of early results of surgery were recorded and analyzed using SPSS 17.0 software. Result: Mean age was 57.49 ± 7.89 years old. 100% of patients were male. 21.9% of patients had comorbidities. Duration of treatment: 63.6% of patients were sent straight to our department, the intubation was removed right at the operating room, and the average hospital stay was 13.83 days. The mean first flatus time was 3.53 days. Pathological results: 100% of patients were squamous cell carcinoma, and 17 patients had no detected tumors and lymph nodes after adjuvant treatment. The lymph node metastasis rate was 3.34%. The rate of respiratory complications was 66.2%, of which the majority was pleural effusion (63.6%). Most respiratory complications were mild (82.4%). The anastomosis leakage rate was 16.9%. Placing an anastomosis below the sternal notch had a lower leakage rate than placing an anastomosis above the sternal notch (0% vs 22%, p=0.029). The chylous leakage rate was 3.9%. Leak at jejunostomy tube was 3.9%, postoperative intestinal obstruction was 2.6%, gastric tube dilatation above the sternum was 1.3%, and intrathoracic herniation of gastric conduit was 2.6%. There were no deaths within 30 days after surgery. Conclusion: Transthoracic video-assisted esophagectomy with a retrosternal gastric tube has good early results: The rate of early complications is low, and there is no mortality within 30 days after surgery.

Article Details

References

1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3): 209-249.
2. Kikuchi H, Endo H, Yamamoto H et al (2022) Impact of reconstruction route on postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy: Analysis of esophagectomies in the Japanese National Clinical Database. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 6(1): 46–53.
3. Iscimen R, Brown DR, Cassivi SD et al (2010) Intensive care unit utilization and outcome after esophagectomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 24(3): 440-446.
4. Nguyễn Xuân Hoà (2018) Nghiên cứu ứng dụng phẫu thuật nội soi cắt thực quản và nạo vét hạch rộng hai vùng (ngực-bụng) trong điều trị ung thư thực quản. Luận án Tiến sĩ học, Đại học Y Hà Nội, Hà Nội.
5. Hồ Hữu An (2019) Nghiên cứu điều trị ung thư thực quản bằng phẫu thuật nội soi ngực phải kết hợp mở bụng. Luận án Tiến sĩ học, Viện Nghiên cứu Dược lâm sàng 108 Hà Nội.
6. Ajani JA, Barthel JS, Bentrem DJ et al (2011) Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 9(8): 830-887.
7. Kikuchi H, Endo H, Yamamoto H et al (2022) Impact of reconstruction route on postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy: Analysis of Esophagectomies in the Japanese National Clinical Database. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 6(1): 46-53.
8. Wang M, Jin Y, Sun G et al (2021) The complications between different routes of reconstruction after esophagectomy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 69(3): 211-215.
9. Yamasaki M, Miyata H, Yasuda T et al (2015) Impact of the route of reconstruction on post-operative morbidity and malnutrition after esophagectomy. World J Surg 39(2): 433-440.
10. Okumura T, Miwa T, Numata Y et al (2022) Reduction of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy with retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction. Dis Esophagus 35(2): 326-335.
11. Mishra PK, Saluja SS, Ramaswamy D et al (2013) Thoracic duct injury following esophagectomy in carcinoma of the esophagus: Ligation by the abdominal approach. World J Surg 37(1): 141–146.
12. Liu L, Gong L, Zhang M et al (2021) The effect of prophylactic thoracic duct ligation during esophagectomy on the incidence of chylothorax and survival of the patients: An updated review. Postgrad Med 133(3): 265–271.
13. Weijs TJ, van Eden HWJ, Ruurda JP et al (2017) Routine jejunostomy tube feeding following esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis 9(8): 851-860.
14. Álvarez-Sarrado E, Mingol Navarro F, J Rosellón R, et al (2019) Feeding Jejunostomy after esophagectomy cannot be routinely recommended. Analysis of nutritional benefits and catheter-related complications. Am J Surg 217(1): 114–120.
15. Uemura N, Abe T, Kawakami J et al (2017) Clinical impact of intrathoracic herniation of gastric tube pull-up via the retrosternal route following esophagectomy. Dig Surg 34(6): 483-488.