The efficacy of simultaneous versus sequential combination of fractional CO2 laser and subcision for post-acne atrophic scars

  • Trần Quốc Bảo Bệnh viện Da liễu Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
  • Trần Nguyên Ánh Tú Bệnh viện Da liễu Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
  • Đoàn Văn Lợi Em Bệnh viện Da liễu Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
  • Nguyễn Trọng Hào Bệnh viện Da liễu Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh

Main Article Content

Keywords

Post-acne atrophic scar, fractional CO2 laser, subcision, simultaneous, sequential

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of simultaneous versus sequential fractional CO2 laser and subcision combination for post-acne atrophic. Subject and method: This is a single-blind, split-face clinical trial including 16 patients with post-acne atrophic scars in Ho Chi Minh City Hospital of Dermatology and Venereology. Each patient underwent three sessions of subcision combined with fractional CO2 laser with a 1-month interval between sessions. The face’s left side is treated with simultaneous combination therapy, while the face’s right side receives sequential combination therapy. The efficacy of the treatment was assessed at week 4, 8 and 12. Result: No significant differences were found in patient-assessed treatment efficacy (p=1.000, 1.000, 0.329). Comparable results were observed when evaluated by a blinded dermatologist (p=1.000, 1.000, and 0.976). Time was a main significant factor affecting acne scar severity (p<0.001). There was no significant interaction between the time factor and treatment method (p=0.647). The main effect of treatment method was not significant (p=0.835). Regarding adverse events, the simultaneous treatment group experienced longer swelling time (p<0.001), shorter downtime (p<0.001), and higher pain level during laser treatment (p=0.022). Conclusion: Despite the longer swelling time and higher pain levels during laser treatment in the simultaneous group, the effectiveness and satisfaction level of CO2 fractional laser and subcision for acne scars was equivalent between the two combinations, with shorter downtime for the simultaneous combination compared to the sequential combination.

Article Details

References

1. Tan JK and Bhate K (2015) A global perspective on the epidemiology of acne. Br J Dermatol 172(1): 3-12.
2. Shalita, Alan R, Del Rosso, James Q, and Webster, Guy F (2011) Acne vulgaris. Informa Healthcare, New York.
3. Bhargava S, Cunha PR, Lee J, Kroumpouzos G (2018) Acne scarring management: Systematic review and evaluation of the evidence. Am J Clin Dermatol 19(4): 459-477.
4. Lee SJ, Suh DH, Chang KY, Kim HJ, Kim TI, Jeong KH, Shin MK, Song KY (2016) The efficacy and safety of subcision using CO2 gas combined with fractional laser for acne scars: Clinical and microscopic evaluation. J Cosmet Laser Ther 18(7): 417-420.
5. Anupama YG and Wahab AJ (2016) Effectiveness of CO2 laser with subcision in patients with acne scars. J Cosmet Laser Ther 18(7): 367-371.
6. Abdel Kareem IM, Fouad, MA, and Ibrahim MK (2020) Effectiveness of subcision using carboxytherapy plus fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: Comparative split face study. J Dermatolog Treat 31(3): 296-299.
7. Nilforoushzadeh MA, Faghihi G, Jaffary F, Haftbaradaran E, Hoseini SM, Mazaheri N (2017) Fractional carbon dioxide laser and its combination with subcision in improving atrophic acne scars. Adv Biomed Res 6: 20.
8. Taylor MB, Zaleski-Larsen L, and McGraw TA (2017) Single session treatment of rolling acne scars using tumescent anesthesia, 20% trichloracetic acid extensive subcision, and fractional CO2 laser. Dermatol Surg 43(1): 70-74.
9. Xu Y and Deng Y (2018) Ablative fractional CO2 laser for facial atrophic acne scars. Facial Plast Surg 34(2): 205-219.
10. Dadkhahfar S, Robati RM, Gheisari M, Moravvej H (2020) Subcision: Indications, adverse reactions, and pearls. J Cosmet Dermatol 19(5): 1029-1038.