Evaluation of 4DCT-based dose distribution simulation in non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy at 175 Military Hospital

  • Đặng Quang Huy Bệnh viện Quân y 175
  • Trần Đức Linh Bệnh viện Quân y 175
  • Nguyễn Đức Công Bệnh viện Quân y 175
  • Phạm Viết Hoạt Bệnh viện Quân y 175
  • Nguyễn Đình Đăng Bệnh viện Quân y 175
  • Đào Đức Tiến Bệnh viện Quân y 175
  • Trương Vũ Mạnh Dũng Bệnh viện Quân y 175
  • Hoàng Thị Kiều Trang Đại học Quốc gia Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
  • Châu Văn Tạo Đại học Quốc gia Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh

Main Article Content

Keywords

Non-small cell lung cancer, treatment plan

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the dose distribution of 4DCT-based dose simulation compared to 3DCT-based simulation. Subject and method: The gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) were delineated in all 10 respiratory phases of 30 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent 4DCT imaging. The PTV-3D was created from CT1 dataset and the PTV-4D from AVG10 dataset. The planned treatment volume (PTV) and volume dose histogram (DVH) were compared between 3D and 4D treatment plans. Result: The mean volumes of PTV3D and PTV4D were 460 ± 179 (69-820) cm3 and 401 ± 167 (127-854) cm3, respectively with p=0.0018. The 4DCT-based radiotherapy dose distribution was lower than that of 3DCT. Compared to 3DCT, the V5, V10, and V20 values for lung were 55.8%, 40.5%, and 28.9% for 4DCT and 59.9%, 44.6%, and 31.2% for 3DCT respectively, with significant differences. However, there was no significant difference in the dose distribution of V30 for lung, heart, esophagus, and spinal cord. Conclusion: The conformity index (CI) and dose homogeneity index (DHI) were not significantly different between the two techniques. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of lung and heart in the 4DCT plan.

Article Details

References

1. Goldstraw P, Ball D, Jett JR et al (2011) Non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet 378: 1727-1740.
2. Balter JM, Ten Haken RK, Lawrence TS, Lam KL, Robertson JM (1996) Uncertainties in CT-based radiation therapy treatment planning associated with patient breathing. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 36: 167-174.
3. Rietzel E, Chen GT, Choi NC, Willet CG (2005) Four-dimensional image-based treatment planning: target volume segmentation and dose calculation in the presence of respiratory motion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61: 1535-1550.
4. Burdett S, Stewart L; PORT Meta-analysis Group (2005) Postoperativeradiotherapyin non-small-cell lung cancer: update of an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 47: 81-83.
5. Underberg RW, Lagerwaard FJ, Slotman BJ, Cuijpers JP, Senan S (2005) Benefit of respiration-gated stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer: an analysis of 4DCT datasets. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62: 554-560.
6. Petrova D, Smickovska S, Lazarevska E (2017) Conformity Index and Homogeneity Index of the Postoperative Whole Breast Radiotherapy. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 5(6): 736-739.
7. Emami B, Lyman J, Brown A, Coia L, Goitein M, Munzenrider JE, Shank B, Solin LJ, Wesson M (1991) Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys 21: 109-122.
8. De Ruysscher D, Faivre-Finn C, Moeller D, Nestle U, Hurkmans CW, Le Péchoux C, Belderbos J, Guckenberger M, Senan S; Lung Group and the Radiation Oncology Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) (2017) Recommendations for planning and delivery of high-dose, high precision radiotherapy for lung cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology 124(1): 1-10.