Initial results of concurrent chemoradiation therapy using EP for neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix at National Cancer Hospital

  • Nguyễn Chí Việt Bệnh viện K
  • Vũ Hồng Thăng Đại học Y Hà Nội
  • Tô Anh Dũng Bệnh viện K
  • Nguyễn Công Hoàng Bệnh viện K

Main Article Content

Keywords

Neuroendocrine carcinoma, concurrent chemoradiotherapy

Abstract

Objective: To study clinical characteristics and treatment response rates to concurrent chemoradiotherapy of neuroendocrine tumors of the uterine cervix (NTUC) at K Hospital from 2018 to 2020. Subject and method: Non-controlled clinical intervention study, we included patients whose tumors were described in the original pathology as NTUC, FIGO IB-IIIC, at K Hospital, from 2018-2020. Patients were treated by definitive chemoradiotherapy using EP regimen. Result: 40 patients were enrolled in the study, the mean age was 45.8, the small cell subtype accounted for the largest (80%), the rate of FIGO stage I, II, III were 17.5%, 35% and 47.5%, respectively. 30/40 patients had complete response (75%), 4/40 patients had partial response (10%) and 6/40 had progressive disease (15%). Conclusion: NTUC was rare disease with poor prognosis, the rate of advanced disease was high. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy using EP was effective for patients with NTUC, however, longer follow-up time is needed to evaluate survival outcome.

Article Details

References

1. Bùi Diệu (2016) Hướng dẫn chẩn đoán và điều trị một số bệnh ung thư thường gặp. tr. 308-318.
2. SEER data for 2003-2007. http://seer.cancer.gov 2010 [cited accessed 02 November 2010.
3. Virarkar M et al (2022) Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gynecologic tract. Cancers (Basel) 14(7).
4. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_ gls/pdf/cervical.pdf.
5. Nguyễn Trọng Diệp (2018) Nhận xét đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng và kết quả điều trị ung thư cổ tử cung thể TKNT giai đoạn IB1-IIA1 tại Bệnh viện K.
6. Boruta DM et al (2001) Multimodality therapy in early-stage neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 81(1): 82-87.
7. Sodsanrat K, Saeaib N, and Liabsuetrakul T (2015) Comparison of clinical manifestations and survival outcomes between neuroendocrine tumor and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: Results from a Tertiary Center in Southern Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai 98(8): 725-733.
8. Viswanathan AN et al (2004) Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: Outcome and patterns of recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 93(1): 27-33.
9. Tempfer CB et al (2018) Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: A systematic review of the literature. BMC Cancer 18(1): 530.
10. Rahakbauw E and Winarto H (2018) Radiotherapy response and related clinicopathological factors of patients with cervical cancer. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1073: 032040.
11. Bese NS, Hendry J, and Jeremic B (2007) Effects of prolongation of overall treatment time due to unplanned interruptions during radiotherapy of different tumor sites and practical methods for compensation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68(3): 654-661.
12. Abdallah R, Bush SH, Chon HS, Apte SM, Wenham RM, and Shahzad MM (2016) Therapeutic Dilemma: Prognostic factors and outcome for neuroendocrine tumors of the cervix. (in eng), Int J Gynecol Cancer 26(3): 553-560.