The efficacy of cervical selective nerve root injection under ultrasound-guided in the management of C5-C7 radiculopathy
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of cervical selective nerve root injection (CSNRI) under ultrasound-guided. Subject and method: From July 2021 to July 2022, a prospective study of 34 patients received ultrasound-guided CSNRI for cervical radicular pain C5-C7 at 108 Military Central Hospital. Patients are evaluated the complication after injection, the effect of procedure by the pain relief with Visual analogue scales (VAS) and the improvement of function of Neck Disability Index (NDI) before procedure and at 10 minutes, 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months after procedure. Result: Our study on the US-guided CSNRI of 34 patients with 20 males and 14 females, the average age was 53.59 ± 8.67. The average VAS score was 8 ± 0.85 preoperatively and this improved to 2.03 ± 1.87; 2.59 ± 1.69; 1.79 ± 1.72 and 1.29 ± 1.29 at 10 minutes, 2 weeks, 1 and 3 months after procedure (p<0.001). The average NDI was 24.91 ± 7.64 preoperatively and this improved to 6.29 ± 5.87 and 4.35 ± 4.14 at 1 and 3 months after procedure (p<0.001). The successful rate of procedure with the decrease VAS more than 50% and the decrease of NDI more than 40% at 1 month and 3 months after procedure were 91.2% and 97.1% respectively. After procedure, there were 5 cases with mild complication (14,7%) with dizziness and nausea and 1 case with transient vasovagal. There was no serious complication. Conclusion: We suggest that ultrasound-guided CSNRI is an effective, safe, simple procedure and free of radiation and provides sustained pain relief in patients with cervical radiculopathy.
Article Details
References
2. Narouze SN (2012) Ultrasound-guided cervical spine injections: Ultrasound “prevents” whereas contrast fluoroscopy “detects” intravascular injections. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 37(2): 127-130.
3. Takeuchi M, Kamiya M, Wakao N, Osuka K, Yasuda M, Terasawa T, Takayasu M (2014) A simple, 10-minute procedure for transforaminal injection under ultrasonic guidance to effect cervical selective nerve root block. Neurologia medico-chirurgica, oa-2013.
4. Pobiel RS, Schellhas KP, Eklund JA, Golden MJ, Johnson BA Chopra S, Shrack K (2009) Selective cervical nerve root blockade: Prospective study of immediate and longer-term complications. American journal of neuroradiology 30(3): 507-511.
5. Cui X, Zhang D, Zhao Y, Song Y, He L, Zhang J (2022) An open-label non-inferiority randomized trail comparing the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided selective cervical nerve root block and fluoroscopy-guided cervical transforaminal epidural block for cervical radiculopathy. Annals of Medicine 54(1): 2681-2691, DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2124445.
6. Park KD, Lee WY, Nam SH, Kim M, Park Y (2019) Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided interlaminar epidural block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: A retrospective comparative study. J Ultrasound 22(2): 167-177. doi: 10.1007/s40477-018-0344-z. Epub 2018 Dec 5. PMID: 30519991; PMCID: PMC6531573.
7. Zhang X, Shi H, Zhou J, Xu Y, Pu S, Lv Y& Du D (2019) The effectiveness of ultrasound-guided cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections in cervical radiculopathy: A prospective pilot study. Journal of pain research 12: 171.
8. Park Y, Ahn JK, Sohn Y, Jee H, Lee JH, Kim J & Park KD (2013) Treatment effects of ultrasound guide selective nerve root block for lower cervical radicular pain: A retrospective study of 1-year follow-up. Annals of rehabilitation medicine 37(5): 658-667.
9. Scanlon GC, Moeller-Bertram T, Romanowsky SM, & Wallace MS (2007) Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections: More dangerous than we think? Spine 32(11): 1249-1256.
10. Jee H, Lee JH, Kim J, Park KD, Lee WY, & Park Y (2013) Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: A randomized, blinded, controlled study. Skeletal radiology 42(1): 69-78.