Investigating some imaging features and results of cervical laminectomy, fixation and fusion for treatment of cervical stenosis due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

  • Nguyễn Trọng Yên Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108
  • Phạm Quang Anh Bệnh viện Quân y 4
  • Nguyễn Đức Tùng Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108
  • Trần Quang Dũng Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108

Main Article Content

Keywords

Cervical spinal stenosis, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, cervical myelopathy

Abstract

Objective: To investigate some characteristics on X-ray, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and the results of cervical laminectomy, fixation and fusion to treat multilevel cervical spinal stenosis due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Subject and method: A retrospective review of 14 patients with OPLL of the cervical spine with myelopathy were operated by cervical laminectomy, fixation and fusion at the Department of Neurosurgery, 108 Military Central Hospital from January 2019 to January 2021. Investigate parameters: C2C7 flexion angle, spinal instability, OPLL characteristics on CT; number of narrow floors, change of spinal cord signal on MRI. The status of cervical spinal cord injury was evaluated according to the JOA scale at 3 time points: preoperative, at hospital discharge and last follow-up. Surgical outcomes were classified into: very good, good, fair, poor based on the recovery rate assessed according to Hirabayashi. Result: The mean C2C7 flexion angle was 9.19⁰ ± 11.11⁰ with 35.7% had kyphosis and 57.1% had spinal instability; 50% had negative K-line, 28.6% had double layer sign. On MRI: 92.9% had increased spinal cord signal on T2W, 7.1% decreased signal on T1W with number of stenosis level 4.21 ± 0.69 (3 ÷ 5 floors) and the most of stenosis level was C4C5 with 42.9%. There was a significant difference between the preoperative JOA score and the postoperative JOA score and the time of last follow-up (p<0.05). The JOA score improved on average 4.14 ± 1.09 points. The average recovery rate was 72.7 ± 16.4%. Bone healing was observed in 100% of patients. There were no patients with kyphosis at the time of hospital discharge and final follow-up. Conclusion: Cervical laminectomy, fixation and fusion is a safe and effective method of treating for multilevel cervical spinal stenosis due to OPLL.

Article Details

References

1. Abiola R, Rubery P, Mesfin A (2016) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Etiology, diagnosis, and outcomes of nonoperative and operative management. Global Spine J 6(2): 195-204.
2. Bajamal AH, Kim SH, Arifianto MR et al (2019) Posterior surgical techniques for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: WFNS spine committee recommendations. Neurospine 16(3): 421-434.
3. Tuchman Alexander, Higgins Dominque MO (2019) Cervical alignment and sagittal balance, degenerative cervical myelopathy and Radiculopathy: Treatment approaches and options. Springer, Switzerland 1: 29 - 36.
4. Yang H, Yang L, Chen D et al (2015) Implications of different patterns of "double-layer sign" in cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Eur Spine J 24(8): 1631-1639.
5. Park JH, Choi CG, Jeon SR et al (2011) Radiographic Analysis of instrumented posterolateral fusion mass using mixture of local autologous bone and b-TCP (PolyBone®) in a lumbar spinal fusion surgery. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 49(5): 267-272.
6. Nguyễn Khắc Hiếu (2019) Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng, chẩn đoán hình ảnh và kết quả phẫu thuật tạo hình cung sau sử dụng nẹp vít điều trị bệnh hẹp ống sống cổ do thoái hóa. Luận án Tiến sỹ Y học, Học Viện Quân Y.
7. Phan Quang Sơn (2015) Nghiên cứu điều trị bệnh lý hẹp ống ống cổ bằng phương pháp tạo hình bản sống cổ kết hợp ghép san hô. Luận án Tiến sỹ Y học, Đại học Y dược Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.
8. Wei L, Cao P Xu C et al (2019) The relationship between preoperative factors and the presence of intramedullary increased signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 178: 1-6.
9. Nouri Aria, Murray Jean-Christophe, Fehlings Michael G (2019) Degenerative cervical myelopathy: A spectrum of degenerative spondylopathies, degenerative cervical myelopathy and Radiculopathy: Treatment approaches and options. 1st ed, Springer, Switzerland 1: 37-52.
10. Ijima Y, Furuya T, Ota M et al (2018) The K-line in the cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament is different on plain radiographs and CT images. J Spine Surg 4(2): 403-407.
11. Anderson Paul A, Finn Michael A (2013) Laminectomy and Posterior Fusion, The Spine, 3nd ed, Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Philadelphia I: 131-142.
12. Du W, Zhang P, Shen Y et al (2014) Enlarged laminectomy and lateral mass screw fixation for multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy associated with kyphosis. Spine J14(1): 57-64.
13. Chang V, Lu DC, Hoffman H et al (2014) Clinical results of cervical laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in 58 consecutive patients. Surg Neurol Int, 5(3): 133-137.
14. Yehya A (2015) The clinical outcome of lateral mass fixation after decompressive laminectomy in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Alexandria Journal of Medicine 51(2): 153-159.