Assessing the result of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in squamous cell esophageal cancer with locoregional invasion
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the results of esophagectomy in patients with locoregional invasion. Subject and method: From March 2020 to August 2021, 17 patients with advanced stage T4a esophageal cancer evaluated intraoperatively underwent esophagectomy using substernal route. Record the characteristics of clinical, paraclinical, disease stage, complications and mortality after surgery. Overall survival was analyzed according to Kaplan-Meier. Prognostic factors were analyzed according to Cox regression model. Data were analyzed using SPSS 20.0 software. Result: 100% of patients were male with histopathological lesion of squamous cell carcinoma. 94.1% of patients received combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The diagnostic concordance rate for depth of invasion was 47.06%. The diagnostic concordance rate for lymph node metastasis was 23.53%. All patients used the retrosternal tunnel. The rate of R0 resection reached 94.1%. The average number of lymph nodes removed was 25.76, of which the average number of positive nodes was 1.18. The pleura was the most invaded organ. About postoperative complications: hoarseness was the most common complication. Mean follow-up time was 7.6 months. Mortality rate was 11.8%. There were no local recurrences. Mean survival time was 17.28 months. The mean survival rate at 12 months postoperatively was 71.4%. Age factors and tumor invasion status, lymph node metastasis had no predictive value for survival (p>0.05). Conclusion: Esophageal cancer stage T4a evaluated intraoperatively has a poor prognosis, however, esophagectomy is feasible and safe.
Article Details
References
2. Ikeda K et al (2001) Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for thoracic esophageal cancer potentially or actually involving adjacent organs. Diseases of the Esophagus 14(3-4): 197-201.
3. Wendy LA, Maura SM, and Ken M (2003) Variability in the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification scale. AANA journal 71(4): 265-276.
4. Thomas WR, Deepa TP, and Eugene HB (2017) AJCC/UICC staging of cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: Application to clinical practice. Annals of cardiothoracic surgery 6(2): 119.
5. Hironori T et al (2012) Multidetector-computed tomography attenuation values between the tumor and aortic wall in response to induction therapy for esophageal cancer and its predictive value for aortic invasion. Experimental and therapeutic medicine 3(2): 243-248.
6. Pierre AC et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Five-year experience. Annals of surgery 250(2): 187-196.
7. Masayuki S et al (2015) Randomized study of low‐dose versus standard‐dose chemoradiotherapy for unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (JCOG0303). Cancer science 106(4): 407-412.
8. Giovanni DM et al (2007) Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus with clinical evidence of adjacent organ invasion. Journal of surgical oncology 95(3): 261-266.
9. Yu Ohkura et al (2019) Prognostic factors and appropriate lymph node dissection in salvage esophagectomy for locally advanced T4 esophageal cancer. Annals of surgical oncology 26(1): 209-216.
10. Akihiko O et al (2020) Salvage esophagectomy for initially unresectable locally advanced T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Esophagus 17(1): 59-66.
11. Ohtsu A et al (1999) Definitive chemoradiotherapy for T4 and/or M1 lymph node squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 17(9): 2915-2921.
12. Bing-Yen Wang et al (2019) Comparison between esophagectomy and definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer. The Annals of thoracic surgery 107(4): 1060-1067.
13. Ronald Chow, et al (2021) Definitive chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy for the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiotherapy and Oncology.