Laparoscopic substernal tunneling in video-assisted transthoracic esophagectomy in treating esophageal cancer

  • Phạm Văn Hiệp 108 Military Central Hospital
  • Nguyễn Anh Tuấn 108 Military Central Hospital
  • Nguyễn Cường Thịnh 108 Military Central Hospital

Main Article Content

Keywords

Esophageal cancer, video-assisted transthoracic esophagectomy, substernal route

Abstract

Objective: To assess the results of laparoscopic substernal tunneling in video-assisted transthoracic esophagectomy. Subject and method: From March 2019 to June 2021, 51 patients underwent video-assisted transthoracic esophagectomy with laparoscopic retrosternal tunneling. The clinical and subclinical characteristics, intraoperative results, postoperative results. Were recorded and analyzed using SPSS 16.0 software. Result: 100% of patients were male. The mean age was 56.73 ± 8.3. The lesion at middle third accounted for the majority. 70.6% of patients received preoperative chemotradiationtherapy. The mean surgery time was 315.47 minutes. 84.3% of patients made anastomosis using circular stapler. Single-lumen endotracheal tube was used, accounting for 72.5% patients. Pathological results after surgery: 23.5% was T0, 23.5% was T1, 31.4% was T2, 7.8% was T3, 11.8% was T4a, 2.0% was T4b. The mean number of havested lymph nodes was 22.08. The mean lymph node metastasis was 0.63. The mean time of laparoscopic tunneling was 17.59 minutes. Pleural tear and pericardial tear were both 2.0%. 74.7% of patients were not in the ICU. The mean hospital stay was 14.12 ± 5.68 days. Anastomosis leakage accounted for 15.7%. Chylothorax leakage accounted for 5.9%. Conclusion: Laparoscopic retrosternal tunneling is a feasible and safe method in video-asissted transthoracic esophagectomy.

Article Details

References

1. Sung H et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A cancer journal for clinicians 71(3): 209-249.
2. Gronnier C, Collet D (2021) New trends in esophageal cancer management. Cancers (Basel) 13(12):3030. doi: 10.3390/cancers13123030.
3. Amit Javed, Anil K Agarwal (2013) Total laparoscopic esophageal bypass using a colonic conduit for corrosive-induced esophageal stricture. Surgical endoscopy 27(10): 3726-3732.
4. Mark BO, Herbert S (1975) Substernal gastric bypass of the excluded thoracic esophagus for palliation of esophageal carcinoma. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 70(5): 836-851.
5. Yuji Tachimori et al (2018) Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2011. Esophagus 15(3): 127.
6. Tomoyoshi Takayama et al (2011) Intrathoracic hernia of a retrosternal colonic graft after esophagectomy: Report of a case. Surgery today 41(9): 1298-1301.
7. Noriyuki Yamamura et al (2006) A case of intrathoracic hernia of jejunal pull-up through retrosternal space after subtotal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg 39: 153-157.
8. Abe N Uemura, Kawakami T, Hosoi J, Ito T, Shimizu S, Clinical impact of intrathoracic herniation of gastric tube pull-up via the retrosternal route following esophagectomy. Digestive surgery 34(6): 483-488.
9. Benedetto M et al (2017) Laparoscopic retrosternal gastric pull-up for fistulized mediastinal mass. World journal of gastrointestinal surgery 9(3): 92.
10. Hong Hu et al (2012) Modifications in retrosternal reconstruction after oesophagogastrectomy may reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery 42(2): 359-363.