Evaluating the accuracy of C2 pedicle screw placement via subarticular entry point

  • Nguyễn Trọng Yên 108 Military Central Hospital

Main Article Content

Keywords

C1-C2 fixation, C2 pedicle screw

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of the C2 pedicle screw placement via subarticular entry point. Subject and method: Retrospective 43 patient was placed C2 pedicle screw placement (73 screws) at Neurosurgery Department of 108 Military Central Hospital from January 2015 to December 2021. All patients were planned based on preoperative 3D computed tomography images, based on the following index: width and height of the pedicle; angles of the pedicle on the axial and saggital planes. The accuracy of screw is determined by the percentage of screw diameter outside the pedicle on on postoperative scans (according to Sciubba’s classification, 2009). Result: The authors found an average pedicle width of 5.0 ± 1.4mm, pedicle height of 4.9 ± 1.3mm, axial angle of 43.1 ± 3.7°, sagittal angle of 18.5 ± 2.4° and the average screw length was 25.7 ± 3.2mm. The C2 pedicle screw placement via subarticular entry point (Yeom's technique) had with high accuracy with 84.9% of the screw is completely inside pedicle. There were no cases of intraoperative vertebral artery and neural structures injury. Conclusion: C2 transpedicular screw placement can be exactly performed using the subarticular entry point. The analysis of preoperative 3D computed tomography data is valuable in planning the surgical proceduce.

Article Details

References

1. Sciubba DM, Noggle JC, Vellimana AK et al (2009) Radiographic and clinical evaluation of free-hand placement of C-2 pedicle screws. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 11: 15-22.
2. Harms J, Melcher RP (2001) Posterior C1–C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 26: 2467–2471.
3. Alosh H, Parker SL, McGirt MJ, Gokaslan ZL, Witham TF, Bydon A, et al (2010) Preoperative radiographic factors and surgeon experience are associated with cortical breach of C2 pedicle screws. J Spinal Disord Tech 23: 9-14.
4. Bydon M, Mathios D, Macki M, De la Garza-Ramos R, Aygun N, Sciubba DM, et al (2014) Accuracy of C2 pedicle screw placement using the anatomic freehand technique. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 125: 24-27.
5. Neo M, Sakamoto T, Fujibayashi S, Nakamura T (2005) The clinical risk of vertebral artery injury from cervical pedicle screws inserted in degenerative vertebrae. Spine 30(24): 2800-2805.
6. Jin Sup Yeom, Jong Hwa Won, Seong Kyu Park, Yoon Ju Kwon, Seung Min Yoo, Young Hee An, Jae Yoon Chung, Ji-Ho Lee, Bong Soon Chang and ChoonKi Lee (2006) The subarticular screw: A new trajectory for the C2 screw. Journal of Korean Spine Surg 13(2): 75-80.
7. Azimi P, Yazdanian T, Benzel EC Aghaei HN, Azhari S, Sadeghi S and Montazeri S (2020) Accuracy and safety of C2 pedicle or pars screw placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 15: 272.
8. Nguyen Duy Hung, Nguyen Minh Duc, Le Viet Dung, Than Van Sy, Le Thanh Dung, Nguyen Duy Hue (2020) Computed Tomographic Study of Vietnamese C1-C2 Morphology for Atlantoaxial Crew Fixation Techniques. Journal of Clinical Imaging Science 10(63).
9. Klepinowski T, Żyłka N, Pala B, Poncyljusz W, Sagan L (2021) Prevalence of high-riding vertebral arteries and narrow C2 pedicles among Central-European population: A computed tomography-based study. Neurosurgical Review 44: 3277–3282.