The change in myocardial strain in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Objective: To survey the change in myocardial strain by 2D speckle tracking echocardiography in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Subject and method: 118 STEMI patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention hospitalized in Vietnam National Heart Institute from January 2016 to March 2019 were included. A cross-sectional descriptive and prospective cohort sudy. Two dimentional (2D) speckle tracking echocardiography was done for all patients within 24 hours after PCI, after 3 days, after 1 month, after 3 months and after 6 months. Echocardiography images were analyzed to assess GLS by EchoPAC 112 software (GE, USA). Result: Mean age: 64.73 ± 11.88 years. Male: 81.4%; Killip I: 75.4%; mean Wall Motion Score Index (WMSI): 1.45 ± 0.23; mean EF: 45.29 ± 6.96%. GLS of the patients after 1 day was worse than that of control subjects. GLS improved over time. GLS after 3 days, after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months were -12.23 ± 2.79%; -13.36 ± 2.87%, -14.10 ± 2.55%; -14.50 ± 2.40, respectively. GLS of culprit artery groups (LAD, LCX and RCA) were not the same at the evaluation times (p<0.001). GLS of TMP < III group was worse than that of TMP III group (p<0.05). GLS of different EF groups were not the same at the evaluation times (p<0.001). Conclusion: GLS by 2D speckle tracking echocardiography in STEMI patients after primary PCI was worse than that of normal people and improving trend over time. GLS of culprit artery groups, different EF groups, TMP < III and TMP III group were not the same at the evaluation times.
Article Details
References
2. Cha MJ, Kim HS, Kim SH et al (2017) Prognostic power of global 2D strain according to left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. PLoS ONE 12(3): 0174160. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal. pone.0174160.
3. Hsiao JF, Chung CM, Chu CM et al (2016) Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography predict left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction in patients with preserved ejection fraction. PLoS One 11(12): 0168109.
4. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS et al (2012) Third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Circulation126(16): 2020-2035.
5. Patel MR, Calhoon JH, Dehmer GJ et al (2017) ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2016 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 69(5): 570-591.
6. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: An update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28(1): 1-39.
7. Joseph G, Zaremba T, Johansen MB et al (2019) Echocardiographic global longitudinal strain is associated with infarct size assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance in acute myocardial infarction. Echo Research and Practice 6(4): 81-89.
8. Joyce E, Hoogslag GE, Leong DP et al (2014) Association between left ventricular global longitudinal strain and adverse left ventricular dilatation after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 7(1): 74-81.
9. Heusch G, Gersh BJ (2017) The pathophysiology of acute myocardial infarction and strategies of protection beyond reperfusion: A continual challenge. Eur Heart J 38(11): 774-784.
10. Lustosa RP, Fortuni F, van der Bijl P et al (2021) Changes in global left ventricular myocardial work indices and stunning detection 3 months After ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 157: 15-21.
11. Manjunath SC, Doddaiah B, Ananthakrishna R et al. (2020) Observational study of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with extended pharmaco-invasive strategy: A six months follow-up study. Echocardiography 37(2): 283-292.