Validation of ABCR and ART scores for predicting overall survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated by transarterial chemoembolization at Hanoi Medical University Hospital

  • Pham Minh Duc Hanoi Medical University
  • Trần Ngọc Ánh Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội ,Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội

Main Article Content

Keywords

ABCR, ART, prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, overall survival, conventional transarterial chemoembolization

Abstract

Objective: To validate of ABCR and ART scores for predicting overall survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated by conventional transarterial chemoembolization at Ha Noi Medical University Hospital. Subject and method: From January 2018 to December 2020, 30 consecutive HCC patients, mainly with the viral-induced disease, were treated with TACE. Using a regression model on the predictive variables of our population, we validated two scores designed to help for predicting overall survival. Result: In the multivariate analysis, three prognostic factors were associated with overall survival: BCLC and AFP (> 200ng/ml) at baseline and absence of radiological response. These factors were included in a score (ABCR, ranging from -3 to +6) which correlates with survival and identifies three groups. The ABCR score was validated and proved to perform better than the ART score in distinguishing between patients' prognoses. Conclusion: The ABCR and ART scores are simple and clinically relevant indexes, summing several prognostic variables endorsed in HCC. An ABCR score ≥ of 4 and ART ≥ of 1.5 before the second TACE identify patients with dismal prognosis who may not benefit from further TACE.

Article Details

References

1. Bosch FX, Ribes J, Cléries R, Díaz M (2005) Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Liver Dis 9(2): 191-211.
2. Bộ Y tế (2012) Hướng dẫn chuẩn đoán và điều trị ung thư tế bào gan nguyên phát. Quyết định số 5250/QĐ-BYT.
3. Brian IC (2016) Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis and Treatment. Accessed.
4. Adhoute X et al (2015) Retreatment with TACE: the ABCR SCORE, an aid to the decision-making process. J. Hepatol 62(4): 855-862.
5. Llovet JM and Bruix J (2003) Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatol. Baltim. Md 37(2): 429-442.
6. Kudo M, Arizumi T, Ueshima K, Sakurai T, Kitano M, and N Nishida N (2015) Subclassification of BCLC B stage hepatocellular carcinoma and treatment strategies: Proposal of modified bolondi’s subclassification (Kinki Criteria). Dig. Dis 33(6): 751–758.
7. Sieghart W et al (2013) The ART of decision making: Retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol. Baltim. Md 57(6): 2261-2273.
8. Hucke F et al (2014) How to STATE suitability and START transarterial chemoembolization in patients with intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol 61(6): 1287-1296.