ISSN: 1859 - 2872
Assessment of surgery results of patients with immediate implant placement at 108 Military Central Hospital
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the surgical results of patients with immediate dental implants at 108 Military Central Hospital. Subject and method: From 2015 to 2021, 85 patients were treated with immediate implant placement after tooth extraction. Result: 67% torque force was a range of 35 - 45N/Cm2, bone grafting rate was 30.4%. Fixed temporary restorations on anterior teeth accounted for 75.0%, while healing abutments on molar accounted for 100%; light pain was 69%, healing time 3 - 4 month healing time was 65.2%; ISQ values have differences with bone grafting, bone density, healing time (p<0.05). Conclusion: The torque force is a decisive factor for oseointegration. Bone grafting when the gap between the alveolar wall and the implant is larger than 2mm. Temporary restorations with anterior teeth and only using healing abutments with molars. Only restorations when the ISQ value was above 65.
Article Details
References
2. Trịnh Hồng Mỹ (2012) Nghiên cứu kỹ thuật cấy ghép implant trên bệnh nhân mất răng có ghép xương, Luận án Tiến sĩ y học, Viện nghiên cứu khoa học Y Dược lâm sàng 108.
3. Tạ Anh Tuấn (2007) Nghiên cứu ứng dụng kỹ thuật Implant để nâng cao hiệu quả phục hình nha khoa. Đề tài cấp Bộ Quốc phòng.
4. Đàm Văn Việt (2013) Nghiên cứu điều trị mất răng hàm trên từng phần bằng kỹ thuật implant có ghép xương. Luận án Tiến sĩ y học, Trường Đại Học Y Hà Nội.
5. Branemark PI (1985) Introduction to osseointegration. In: Branemark P-I, Zarb C, Albrektsson T (eds.) Tissue-Integrated Prostheses. Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Quintessence Publishing Co., Chicago: 11-76.
6. Chen ST, Beagle J, Jensen SS et al (2009) Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding surgical techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24: 272-278.
7. Chen ST, Wilson TG, and Hämmerle CHF (2004) Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: Review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19: 12–25.
8. Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE et al (2012) Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 23(6): 2-21.
9. Missika P, Abbou M and Rahal B (1997) Osseous regeneration in immediate postextraction implant placement: A literature review and clinical evaluation. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 9(2): 165-175; quiz 176.
10. Schropp L and Isidor F (2008) Timing of implant placement relative to tooth extraction. J Oral Rehabil 35(1): 33-43.
11. Slagter KW, den Hartog L, Bakker NA et al (2014) Immediate placement of dental implants in the esthetic zone: A systematic review and pooled analysis. J Periodontol 85(7): 241-250.
12. Watzek G, Haider R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N et al (1995) Immediate and delayed implantation for complete restoration of the jaw following extraction of all residual teeth: A retrospective study comparing different types of serial immediate implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 10(5): 561-567.
Article Sidebar
