ISSN: 1859 - 2872
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of immediate implant placement at 108 Military Central Hospital
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate clinical and radiographic characteristics of patients with immediate implant placement at 108 Military Central Hospital. Subject and method: From 2015 to 2021, 85 patients were treated with immediate implant placement after tooth extraction. Result: 61.2% males, the average age of patients was 44.1 ± 15.1 years (an age range of 18 - 76 years). 111 teeth were extracted but 112 fixtures were implanted. Anterior tooth was 36%, premolar was 28.8% and molar was 35.1%. Non-restorable caries was main cause (39.6%), retained deciduous tooth was 4.5%. 91% implants was longer than 10mm, 42.4% tissue was thin and 16.5% was high smile line. The bone density D3 was very common in both arch and all region (71.4%), D4 bone was 5.4%. Result: Immediate implant placement can be performed in many different ages and tooth regions, it is necessary to select patients with enough bone to ensure initial stability for oseointegration.
Article Details
References
2. Bùi Việt Hùng (2017) Nghiên cứu phẫu thuật và đánh giá kết quả cấy ghép nha khoa nhóm răng trước. Luận án Tiến sĩ y học, Viện nghiên cứu khoa học Y Dược lâm sàng 108.
3. Trịnh Hồng Mỹ (2012) Nghiên cứu kỹ thuật cấy ghép implant trên bệnh nhân mất răng có ghép xương. Luận án Tiến sĩ y học, Viện nghiên cứu khoa học Y Dược lâm sàng 108.
4. Tạ Anh Tuấn (2007) Nghiên cứu ứng dụng kỹ thuật Implant để nâng cao hiệu quả phục hình nha khoa. Đề tài cấp Bộ Quốc phòng.
5. Đàm Văn Việt (2013) Nghiên cứu điều trị mất răng hàm trên từng phần bằng kỹ thuật implant có ghép xương. Luận án Tiến sĩ y học, Trường Đại Học Y Hà Nội.
6. Beagle JR (2013) Surgical Essentials of Immediate Implant Dentistry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
7. Gelb DA (1993) Immediate implant surgery: Three-year retrospective evaluation of 50 consecutive cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 8(4): 388-399.
8. Hämmerle CHF, Chen ST and Wilson TG (2004) Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19: 26-28.
9. Jasim Al-Juboori M, Jasim Al-Juboori A, Mei Wen T et al (2017) The relationship between the lip length and smile line in a Malaysian population: A cross-sectional study. Dent Oral Craniofac Res 3(4).
10. Jung RE, Zembic A Pjetursson BE et al (2012) Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 23(6): 2-21.
11. Kan JYK, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K et al (2010) Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: Visual versus direct measurement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 30(3): 237-243.
12. Schropp L and Isidor F (2008) Timing of implant placement relative to tooth extraction. J Oral Rehabil 35(1): 33-43.
Article Sidebar
