Efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis with or without cholangitis

  • Nguyen Thi Phuong Lien 108 Military Central Hospital
  • Nguyen Lam Tung 108 Military Central Hospital
  • Pham Thuy Dung 108 Military Central Hospital
  • Le Thi Anh Tuyet 108 Military Central Hospital
  • Vu Van Khien 108 Military Central Hospital

Main Article Content

Keywords

Acute biliary pancreatitis, cholangitis, common bile duct stone, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the result of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) with or without cholangitis. Subject and method: A retrospective cohort study, 30 patients of ABP at Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 108 Military Central Hospital, from January 2019 to November 2021. Result: We divided the patients into 2 groups: 19 patients ABP with cholangitis, 11 patients without cholangitis. Mean age: 60.7 ± 17.9 (26 - 92), male/female (1.5). The technical success rates were 94.7% and 100%, the clinical success rates were 100% and 90.9% of the two groups with and without cholangitis, respectively. The concomitant cholangitis was not associated with the timing of ERCP (p=0.192), technical success rate (p=0.439), and clinical success rate (p=0.367). And the total length of hospital stay was not different between the two groups (7.7 ± 3 vs. 7.7 ± 4.1 days, p=0.974). No significant differences were found in the duration of hospital after ERCP or procedural-related complications, in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis, according to the concomitant disease (with vs without cholangitis). Conclusion: These findings support ERCP could be performed effectively and safely in acute biliary pancreatitis with or without cholangitis.

Article Details

References

1. Arvanitakis M, Dumonceau JM, Albert J et al (2018) Endoscopic management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) evidence-based multidisciplinary guidelines. Endoscopy 50: 524-546.
2. Folsch UR, Nitsche R, Ludtke R, Hilgers RA, Creutzfeldt W (1997) Early ERCP and papillotomy compared with conservative treatment for acute biliary pancreatitis. The German Study Group on Acute Biliary Pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 336: 237-242.
3. Neoptolemos JP, London N, Slater ND, Carr-Locke DL, Fossard DP, Moosa AR (1986) A prospective study of in the diagnosis and treatment of gallstone acute pancreatitis A rational and safe approach to management. Arch Surg 121(6): 697-702.
4. Nonikov A (2018) ERCP Improves mortality in acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis. American Journal of Gastroenterology 113: 44.
5. Schepers NJ, Hallensleben NDL et al (2020) Urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment in predicted severe acute gallstone pancreatitis (APEC): A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 396(10245): 167-176.
6. Seiki K (2018) Tokyo Guidelines 2018: Diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci (2018) 25: 17-30.
7. Ulku Saritas and Yucel Ustundag (2021) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute biliary pancreatitis, Intech Open DOI: 10.5772/ intechopen.96545.
8. Yuk TL (2008) ERCP chapter 33, Choledocholithiasis, Copyright 2008 Elsevier Inc: 357-366.