A value assessment of modified Amsterdam index forecast the risk for osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tran Thi Hang Đại học Y Dược Thái Bình
  • Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Lan Đại Học Y Hà Nội
  • Lê Đình Tuân Đại học Y Dược Thái Bình
  • Nguyễn Thị Phi Nga Học viện Quân y
  • Nguyễn Tiến Sơn Học viện Quân y
  • Vũ Thanh Bình Đại học Y Dược Thái Bình
  • Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Huyền Đại học Y Dược Thái Bình
  • Dương Huy Hoàng Đại học Y Dược Thái Bình

Main Article Content

Keywords

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the modified Amsterdam index, bone mineral density

Abstract

Objective: To assess the value of the modified Amsterdam index forecast the risk for osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Subjects and method: A descriptional and cross-sectional study on 128 inpatients with RA examined in Department of Rheumatology at the Bach Mai Hospital. Result: The high risk for osteoporosis according to the modified Amsterdam index was 84.4%. The modified Amsterdam index provided a sensitivity of 97.44%, a specificity of 21.35%, a positive predictive value of 35.2%, and the area under the curve ROC (ROC AUC) of 0.64 with 95% CI from 0.55 to 0.73 at the femoral neck for identifying osteoporosis in our study population. While changing the threshold for weight indicator from less than 50kg in term of scoring indicator increased the specificity up to 35.96% and ROC AUC to 0.69 with 95%CI from 0.59 to 0.78, the sensitivity reduced to 89.74%. Conclusion: The high risk of osteoporosis interpreted by the modified Amsterdam index in patients with RA was 84.4%. It is feasible to employ the modified Amsterdam index to screen for osteoporosis among patients with RA in order to consequently measure bone mineral density for further intervention.

Article Details

References

1. Trần Ngọc Ân (1998) Bệnh thấp khớp. Nhà xuất bản Y học, Hà Nội.
2. Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Lan (2010) Bệnh học cơ xương khớp nội khoa. Nhà xuất bản Giáo dục Việt Nam, Hà Nội.
3. Carmen Gómez-Vaquero, Dolors Martínez, Aguila et al (2007) Evaluation of two proposals based on clinical factors for selecting male patients with rheumatoid arthritis that should undergo a bone densitometry. Reumatología Clínica 3(2): 63-66.
4. Caroline Brand C, Lowe A, Hall S (2008) The utility of clinical decision tools for diagnosing osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9: 13 (doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-13).
5. Dunne CA, Moran CJ, and Thompson PW (1995) The effect of regular intramuscular corticosteroid therapy on bone mineral density in rheumatoid patients. Scand J Rheumatol 24(1): 48-49.
6. Gonzalez-Lopez L, Gamez-Nava JI, Vega-Lopez A et al (2012) Performance of risk indices for identifying low bone mineral density and osteoporosis in Mexican Mestizo women with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 34: 247-253.
6. Haugeberg G, Orstavik RE, Uhlig T et al (2002) Clinical decision rules in rheumatoid arthritis: Do they identify patients at high risk for osteoporosis? Testing clinical criteria in a population based cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis recruited from the Oslo Rheumatoid Arthritis Register. Ann Rheum Dis 61: 1085-1089.
7. Nolla JM, Fiter J, Gomez-Vaquero et al (2001) Value of clinical factors in selecting postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis for bone densitometry. Ann Rheum Dis 60: 799-801.
8. Lems WF and Dijkmans BA (1998) Should we look for osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?. Ann Rheum Dis 57: 325-327.