ISSN: 1859 - 2872
Study the role of 320 detector row CT in the evaluation of vascular invasion in periampullary tumors
Main Article Content
Keywords
Computed tomography, periampullary tumor, surgical capability, vascular invasion
Abstract
Objective: To assess the role of 320 detector row CT in evaluation of vascular invasion in periampullary tumors. Subject and method: A retrospective, prospective and descriptive study was carried out on 85 patients with clinically suspected periampullary tumors, underwent surgery and had pathological results, from January 2016 to May 2020 at 108 Military Central Hospital. Result: The male:female ratio was 1.3 and the average age was 62.8. The role of 320 detector row CT in evaluation of vascular invasion in periampullary tumors: Se: 88.2%, Sp: 95.6%, Acc: 94.1%, NPV: 97%, PPV: 83.3%. Kappa coefficient: 0.82. Conclusion: 320 detector row CT is an effective method to evaluate the vascular invasion in periampullary tumors.
Article Details
References
1. Nguyễn Xuân Khái, Trần Công Hoan (2013) Giá trị của chụp cắt lớp vi tính 64 dãy trong chẩn đoán u đầu tụy. Y học thực hành, 873, số 6/2013, tr. 72-74.
2. American Cancer Society (2017) Cancer facts and figures, 22-23.
3. Fong ZV, Tan WP, Lavu H et al (2013) Preoperative imaging for resectable periampullary cancer: Clinicopathologic implications of reported radiographic findings. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 17(6): 1098-1106.
4. Gouma DJ, Geenen RC, Gulik TM et al (2000).Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232: 786-795.
5. Kanji ZS and Gallinger S (2013) Diagnostic and management of pancreatic cancer. CMAJ: 1-7.
6. Williams JL, Chan CK, Toste PA et al (2017) Association of histopathologic phenotype of periampullary adenocarcinomas with survival. JAMA Surgery 152(1): 82-88.
7. Shen YN, Bai XL, Li GG and Liang TB (2017) Review of radiological classifications of pancreatic cancer with peripancreatic vessel invasion: Are new grading criteria required?. Cancer Imaging: 17:14.
2. American Cancer Society (2017) Cancer facts and figures, 22-23.
3. Fong ZV, Tan WP, Lavu H et al (2013) Preoperative imaging for resectable periampullary cancer: Clinicopathologic implications of reported radiographic findings. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 17(6): 1098-1106.
4. Gouma DJ, Geenen RC, Gulik TM et al (2000).Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232: 786-795.
5. Kanji ZS and Gallinger S (2013) Diagnostic and management of pancreatic cancer. CMAJ: 1-7.
6. Williams JL, Chan CK, Toste PA et al (2017) Association of histopathologic phenotype of periampullary adenocarcinomas with survival. JAMA Surgery 152(1): 82-88.
7. Shen YN, Bai XL, Li GG and Liang TB (2017) Review of radiological classifications of pancreatic cancer with peripancreatic vessel invasion: Are new grading criteria required?. Cancer Imaging: 17:14.
Article Sidebar
Published
Apr 1, 2021
Section
Articles
How to Cite
ChiP. M., Cường Đỗ Đức, QuyếtL. V., TuyếnN. V., & VượngN. V. (2021). Study the role of 320 detector row CT in the evaluation of vascular invasion in periampullary tumors. Tạp Chí Y Dược lâm sàng 108, 16(DB4). https://doi.org/10.52389/ydls.v16iDB4.1023