Mid-term results of surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis at 108 Military Central Hospital

  • Ngo Tuan Anh 108 Military Central Hospital
  • Do Xuan Hai 108 Military Central Hospital

Main Article Content

Keywords

Aortic valve replacement, aortic stenosis

Tóm tắt

Objective: To study on medium-term results after aortic valve replacement surgery for aortic stenosis (AS) at 108 Military Central Hospital. Subject and method: 67 patients with AS received aortic artificial valves replacement. The results collected at the time of 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months include: NYHA class, echocardiography (LVEDd, LVEDs, AVA, mean PG), Sokolow-Lyon, PPM and complications. Evaluation is based on the criteria of the Vietnam National Heart Association and the Guidelines of the ACC/AHA. Result: NYHA 1 was increased (76.1%) and NYHA 2 - 3 was 23.9% with p<0.05 in 6 months and an increasing trend at later times (p>0.05). Sokolow-Lyon index < 35mm after surgery > 90%, mid-term echocardiography AVA about 1.6cm², LVEF > 60%, mean PG < 20mmHg, LVEDd and LVEDs within normal limits. Hemorrhagic complications, stuck aortic valve (≤ 3.8%), fuite paraprosthetiques did not appear after 6 months. Conclusion: The medium-term outcome after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis has good clinical and subclinical improvement and the rate of medium-term complications is low.

Article Details

Các tài liệu tham khảo

1. Phạm Nguyễn Vinh và cộng sự (2008) Khuyến cáo 2008 về chẩn đoán và điều trị các bệnh van tim. Khuyến cáo của Hội Tim mạch học Việt Nam.
2. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Fleisher LA, Jneid H, Mack MJ, McLeod CJ, O'Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt TM 3rd, Thompson A (2017) 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 135(25):e1159-e1195.
3. Nguyễn Hải Âu (2019) Đánh giá kết quả điều trị phẫu thuật trên bệnh nhân hẹp van động mạch chủ tại Khoa Phẫu thuật tim - Bệnh viện Chợ Rẫy, thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.
4. Chiappini B, Camurri N, Loforte A et al (2004) Outcome after aortic valve replacement in octogenarians. The Annals of thoracic surgery 78(1): 85-89.
5. Hahn RT (2013) Comparison of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis: A longitudinal study of echocardiography parameters in cohort a of the PARTNER trial (Placement of aortic transcatheter valves). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 61(25): 2514-2521.
6. Gaudino M (2005) Survival after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: Does left ventricular mass regression have a clinical correlate?. Eur. Heart J 26(1): 51-57.
7. Pibarot P (2018) Imaging for predicting and assessing prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 12(1): 149-162.
8. Demirsoy E, Demir I, Ugur M (2019) Management of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 7(2): 60-65.
9. Bilkhu R, Jahangiri M, Otto CM (2019) Patient-prosthesis mismatch following aortic valve replacement. Heart 105(1): 28-33.